Zé Vieira

Twitter pra sorteios reutilizado

[Zé Vieira @ZeCahill]

@JHB8dance @WinnerTien @AlisDanielle Here he was returning a grass body serve, Tien was on the net and got hit, Fonseca apologized twice.
Against Sinner he hit a smash right at sinner’s direction (usually a player commits to a side, but he stood still and dodged at the last sec).

[Zé Vieira @ZeCahill]

@WinnerTien @fonsischeming Fonseca did the best he could returning a grass body serve, he didn´t mean to hit Tien and apologized twice afterwards.
Less hate and more love between our nextgen players and fans 🤝❤️

[Zé Vieira @ZeCahill]

@redbutchracing @fonsischeming Sorry 😅, there´s so much Fonseca hate, I had to defend our Brazilian teen. Thx for clarifying it. 🙌

[Zé Vieira @ZeCahill]

@redbutchracing @fonsischeming To return serve on Grass (doubles) is hard,
That point Fonseca did the best he could returning a body serve, he didn´t mean to hit Tien and apologized twice afterwards.

[Zé Vieira @ZeCahill]

@Rafequiix @fonsecaupdates Melhorou, mas tem q melhorar muito.
O 1º saque dele não tá sendo uma arma.
De novo ele teve mais % de ponto no 2º saque do que no 1º, nos dois sets (problema).
Não tá conseguindo ter precisão e força que precisa (tinha em Indian wells). Mesmo assim, não sacou mal.

[Zé Vieira @ZeCahill]

@fonsecaupdates Fonseca tava bem mais leve, com melhor energia, ele e o alemão alternaram a dominância durante o jogo. Primeiro Set completamente no controle, segundo mais disputado, mas mantiveram nível melhor.
É bom ver o João saindo de quadra com uns aces, winners e um sorriso. 6-2 7-6 🙏

[Zé Vieira @ZeCahill]

@fonsecaupdates 0% de adaptação na grama... o que mais doeu foi o primeiro saque,
tava tão ruim que comecei a torcer pra errar logo e pra ter chance de ganhar o point no segundo...🙃
Bom jogo do alemão, vamos torcer pra estar melhor na próxima.

[Zé Vieira @ZeCahill]

@pgfolkesson @bgtennisnation Wrong, the "2026 ATP Official Rulebook" couldn't be more clear, check again:
7.22, G:
Spectator noise, expressly a shout "out", isn't considered unintentional hindrance, there's no doubt, just read.

Also, the fact a player made the error before the potential "hindrance" matters.

[Zé Vieira @ZeCahill]

@Alina58264185 @Filippo65253305 I think Rudd didn´t complain about that becouse the shout came *after* he made contact, so it was a forced error caused by fonseca´s forehand, not by the crowd. (and spectators shouting out isn´t usualy a significant hindrance acording to the rules)

[Zé Vieira @ZeCahill]

@TonyPepps @ericsalliot Wrong, the spectator called AFTER Rudd finished contact, it was a forced error from him. Even if it was before, the rules don´t say the point should be replayed, the player is expected to play through the crowd´s noise, even a false out, it would be a rare exeption not the rule.

[Zé Vieira @ZeCahill]

@BRNCS__ @pamelam35 She´s wrong, the ball was in

[Zé Vieira @ZeCahill]

@pamelam35 Ball was clearly in, Pamela.
Linesman called it, the Umpire confirmed it and the mark proved it.
The official Hawkeye has 3,5mm of margin on hard, it´s larger on clay and even larger on the unofficial TV News simulation setup that called "out". No gap, even you can see it too:

[Zé Vieira @ZeCahill]

@Jeme96 @TheTennisLetter Ball was clearly in, Jamil.
Linesman called it, the Umpire confirmed it and the mark proved it.
The official Hawkeye has 3,5mm of margin on hard, it´s larger on clay and even larger on the unofficial TV News simulation setup that called "out". No gap, even you can see it too:

[Zé Vieira @ZeCahill]

@pgfolkesson @bgtennisnation Wrong, the spectator called AFTER Rudd finished contact, it was a forced error from him. Even if it was before, the rules don´t say the point should be replayed, the player is expected to play through the crowd´s noise, even a false out, it would be a rare exeption not the rule.

[x @m71845100]

@pablofdza @bgtennisnation Nope. The camera showed the mark. The ball was clearly in.

[Zé Vieira @ZeCahill]

@dbdegn @bgtennisnation It was in, you could see it in the TV, the gap between the ball and the line stoped at the mark. Close, but the Hawkeye has a 2mm margin of error and the unofficial news simulation probably has even more. The umpire saw no gap because there wasn´t, Rudd didn´t even complain.

[Zé Vieira @ZeCahill]

@bgtennisnation An official Hawkeye makes mistakes, it has 2mm of error, even the line judges saw it in. This tournament doesn´t have an official Hawkeye, who called out was only the crowd (after Rudd finished contact), and a TV news simulation setup (we don´t know the margin of error).

[Zé Vieira @ZeCahill]

@bgtennisnation She clearly pointed out that there wasn´t any gap between the ball mark and the line, we can see in this video a clear point where the darker clay next to the white line stops to make the mark of the ball, Rudd must have seen it too. There´s no question according to the rules.

[Zé Vieira @ZeCahill]

@IceDog07 @josemorgado He represents Brazil, but Brazil will always represent a part of Portugal’s legacy, so of course his success will always mean the success of Portugal too!
For sure a huge celebration for both our countries!! ❤️🇧🇷🇵🇹❤️

[Zé Vieira @ZeCahill]

@Aleczandxr For Kreia’s sake, please do a couple of unscripted videos on your second channel about it when you finish it, I would love to hear more!