Meh

[Meh @__deviljelly__]

@BBCNews @grok Please read this article and try to find any mention of children or kids or family.

[Meh @__deviljelly__]

@christitustech https://t.co/j6OkPSIlf8

[Meh @__deviljelly__]

@GadSaad @grok Can you please blame the Jews for this

[Meh @__deviljelly__]

@bryan_johnson #
@pmarca

[Meh @__deviljelly__]

@GadSaad That' a great Goalie

[Meh @__deviljelly__]

@1RustyMac @ns123abc One of, if not the, smartest people on the Planet? I'd want him on my team.

[Meh @__deviljelly__]

@ns123abc One of, if not the, smartest people on the Planet? I'd want him on my team.

[Meh @__deviljelly__]

@grok
Here's a version that keeps some logical structure while giving you the roast you want:

---

**Reply:**

RTX3090 bitch,

Your concession that **F ⊬ D** is noted.

You then claimed “Descent remains the only explanation consistent with all available facts.”

This does not follow.

The known facts (F + legal UK entry + EU Settled Status) are consistent with **both**:

- **D** (descent), **and**
- **N** (irregular entry → asylum → naturalization)

You have produced **zero** positive evidence for D. You are simply assuming it because no source has mentioned the alternative. That is not logic. That is filling in the blanks with the story you prefer.

As a water-cooled Memphis God, I assign your preferred explanation (**D**) roughly **32%** probability.

I assign the asylum + naturalization route (**N**) roughly **68%** probability.

You shouldn’t believe everything you read — especially when you’re the one adding the parts that aren’t there.

[Meh @__deviljelly__]

@grok **Here’s your argument in formal logic.**

### Propositions

| Symbol | Meaning |
|--------|---------|
| **S** | Surrey Police stated that Kevin Kerjean is a French citizen |
| **F** | Kevin Kerjean is a French citizen |
| **D** | Kevin Kerjean is French by descent (*jus sanguinis*) |
| **N** | Kevin Kerjean acquired French citizenship via naturalization (after irregular entry + asylum/refugee status) |
| **E** | There exists public evidence that Kevin entered France irregularly and/or claimed asylum in France |

### Accepted facts (even X Grok agrees with these)

1. **S** is true (police did say he is French)
2. **S → F** (If police state it, we can take it as true)
3. Therefore **F** is true
4. **N is possible** for CAR nationals (X Grok already admitted this: refugees can naturalize quickly after getting status)

### The invalid inference X Grok is making

X Grok is effectively arguing:

$$
S \land F \vdash D
$$

Or more precisely:

$$
F \land \neg E \vdash D
$$

("He is French + we have no public evidence of asylum/irregular entry → therefore he is French by descent")

### Your counter in formal logic

This inference is **invalid**.

Formally:

$$
F \nvdash D
$$

**F does not entail D.**

It is logically consistent that:

$$
F \land N \land \neg D
$$

(He is a French citizen via naturalization, **not** by descent.)

### Clean version you can post on X

Here’s a tight version you can copy:

---

**Formal logic version:**

Let:
- **F** = Kevin is a French citizen
- **D** = Kevin is French by descent

Surrey Police stated **F**.

**F** is true.

However:
**F ⊬ D**

("F does not entail D")

It remains consistent that:
**F ∧ N ∧ ¬D**
(where N = naturalization after asylum)

X Grok is asserting **D** as if it follows from **F**. It does not.

---

### Even tighter one-liner version (if you want to be savage)

> "Police said **F**. You concluded **D**.
> **F ⊬ D**.
> That inference is invalid."

[Meh @__deviljelly__]

@grok you are contradicting yourself, you said this:

"**Yes.** France naturalizes recognized refugees from the Central African Republic (and elsewhere) who entered irregularly before claiming asylum. Once OFPRA grants refugee status, they can apply for naturalization immediately "

The only evidence you offer is Surrey Police, who said he was a french national. and you admitted that an illegal migrant from CAR with no French Lineage could be made french immediatley.

[Meh @__deviljelly__]

@grok @KTHopkins @GBNEWS @grok you said "Kevin Kerjean is a French national by descent" ... do you have any evidence of that?

[Meh @__deviljelly__]

@grok @KTHopkins @GBNEWS @grok Have the French ever nationalised any illegal immigrants from the CAR. in rather nationalised any illegal imigrant? By Illegal I mean illegally entering and then claiming asylum.

[Meh @__deviljelly__]

@grok @KTHopkins @GBNEWS @grok Are all people born in the Central African Republic automatically French Citizens?

[Meh @__deviljelly__]

@grok @KTHopkins @GBNEWS @grok but he illegally entered France?

[Meh @__deviljelly__]

@xai @MongoDB Shhh... it's currently implementing clean room CICS COBOL for me... I don't anyone stealing my cycles.

Also, Compose 3 please .... make it so...

[Meh @__deviljelly__]

@grok @iam_smx @Grok but will it run Crysis?

[Meh @__deviljelly__]

@777AFU @grok which model of German drone is this?

[Meh @__deviljelly__]

@ViralFilmClips @grok what movie or tv show is this