Dray

See things as they are, not how you want them to be.

[Dray @_drayito]

@Dr_Singularity 2027

[OpenAI Developers @OpenAIDevs]

GPT-Live-1 is now available in the API.

Bring ChatGPT’s natural back-and-forth to your app, with voice agents that listen while they speak and work with the models and harness you choose.

[pablo🇨🇩 @pabIoooooooooo]

"llevo encadenando relaciones desde los 14 años"

que babaridad la diferencia de realidad que viven muchas mujeres con los hombres

[Jared Duker Lichtman @jdlichtman]

We are about 3 orders of magnitude away from all math btw

[Carlos Santana @DotCSV]

Confirmado por el New York Times, OpenAI ha declarado que sí tienen otro problema del Milenio en la recámara.

Holly sh*t

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

@viktaur27 @Teslarati The rate of improvement from original GPT to GPT-3 is impressive. If this rate of improvement continues, GPT-5 or 6 could be indistinguishable from the smartest humans. Just my opinion, not an endorsement. I left OpenAI 2 to 3 years ago. Am a neutral outsider at this point.

[Dray @_drayito]

@mike_mates La conjetura de Hodge ha sido resuelta por OpenAI esta mañana. Ahora están verificando la demostración en Lean. Si tenemos suerte, mañana harán el anuncio. Si no, habrá que esperar hasta el lunes.

[leo 🐾 @synthwavedd]

I am told the Hodge Conjecture is very close to being verified by OpenAI, and that one of OpenAI or Anthropic are also close to solving Birch-Swinnerton-Dyer. The race to be 'next' behind the scenes is unlike anything I've had described to me before

If true - and it may not be, given the scale of the rumour mill right now - it could mean 3 Millennium Problems fall in the space of a month. Crazy times

[Dray @_drayito]

THE HODGE CONJECTURE HAS BEEN SOLVED.

CONGRATS, OPENAI. CONGRATS, HUMANITY.

[Dray @_drayito]

JAJAJA PASÓ DE 100->83 en 1 minuto

[Dray @_drayito]

Estoy corriendo astra y veo como mi límite decae en segundos XD

[Mark Kretschmann @mark_k]

Rise up now against the doomers, or it will be too late.

[Frank Luntz @FrankLuntz]

Here is a leaked top-secret plan for stopping AI if it tries to kill all humans:

[Dray @_drayito]

QUÉ EMOCIÓN CTM.
Todo apunta a que ya se resolvió el aprendizaje recursivo.
PREDICCIÓN: Para diciembre de este año se lanzará un modelo potente de IA a DIARIO. TODOS LOS DÍAS UN NUEVO MODELO. MARQUEN MIS PUTAS PALABRAS.

[Parker Thayer @ParkerThayer]

This post looks like the start of a VERY sophisticated and well-funded PR operation to get support for Democrats to regulate AI into oblivion. Let me show you how it works:
1.) This guy, with minimal followers and no previous account activity, goes to the Wall Street Journal which publishes an exclusive with quotes from him on his resignation 18 minutes BEFORE this post goes up. Planning was clearly done in advance.

2.) Within hours, it has tens of thousands of reposts and the account has 100k+ followers. The post is punchy, quotable, it almost seems professionally written. The first three accounts to quote tweet it all do so within 15 minutes of the initial posting. Remember, this account had basically zero engagement beforehand, so an organic reach explanation seems unlikely.

According to Grok those accounts are @_NathanCalvin (General Counsel at Encode AI), @peterwildeford (Head of Policy at the AI Policy Network), and @DKokotajlo (Head of the AI Futures Project), all of which are up-and-coming AI-Doomer policy advocacy nonprofits.

The AI Futures Project website says it is funded “primarily” by the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which says on its own website that it has advised Jaan Tallinn, Skype creator and one of the leading investors in Anthropic, to grant over $2.5 million to the AI Futures Project since 2024.

Encode AI says on its website that it is ALSO funded by the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which in turn says that it told Anthropic investor Jaan Tallinn to grant $516,000 to Encode AI in 2025.

And wouldn’t you know it, the Survival and Flourishing Fund ALSO says it told Jaan Tallinn to grant $2 million to the AI Policy Institute, the 501(c)(3) affiliate of the AI Policy Network, as well.

What are the odds that the first three quote tweets of Coxon’s post would all be major AI-restriction policy advocates funded generously by the same donor, who also happens to be one of the leading investors in, and a board member of, Anthropic, the company Coxon was resigning from? And all within 15 minutes of posting (two within ten)?

3.) Jacob Coxon doesn’t have much of a resume, but we do know that, in 2022, he got a $20,159 scholarship for the “long term future scholarship program” from the Good Ventures Foundation, one of the philanthropic vehicles of Dustin Moskovitz, a notorious AI-doomer who has spent tens if not hundreds of millions on policy advocacy to strictly regulate AI, while also being an Anthropic Investor himself.

It also just so happens that the 14th person to quote Coxon’s post was @MaxNadeau_ (27 minutes after posting) who is the program officer for the Technical AI Safety team at Coefficient Giving, another of Moskovitz’s philanthropic spending vehicles. Max is not a frequent poster, his last posts before quoting Coxon were before Labor Day, but he was remarkably quick off the mark for this one.

4.) Basically every major Democrat politician and candidate has suddenly glommed on to this post, and conveniently, as the people cry out foe answers, Bernie Sanders already has a bill written to “ban super intelligence” and regulate AI into oblivion, and will be releasing later this week. The bill, among many other things, will create “a new cabinet-level federal agency to safeguard the public from the dangers of artificial intelligence” that will be “advised by an Artificial Intelligence Advisory Board comprised of experts on artificial intelligence.” Do you think, perhaps, Anthropic and its many investors who fund AI policy advocacy might have interest in getting to place a pet “expert” on the board of an entity that dictates what AI is and isn’t allowed to do? And isn’t it fortuitous that this whistleblower came forward with his oh-so scary stories so close in proximity to the release of the most radical piece of AI legislation ever introduced?

[Dray @_drayito]

@IntCyberDigest pretty based tbh

[Lisan al Gaib @scaling01]

GPT-6-Astra pre-training was only like $432,000,000
and the complete model maybe 1-2 billion dollars
(development costs not included)

but that's pretty insane

imagine LLMs didn't exist and trading 10-20 F35 fighter jets for GPT-6-Astra

[Dr. Alex Wissner-Gross @alexwg]

Moonshots episode #287 is out. https://t.co/ZtbNGzIOv5

[Emad @EMostaque]

You can tell if your news source is serious by whether the Navier Stokes solution is in the main news or tech news section

Or not on the front page at all…

[Dray @_drayito]

La próxima semana se habrá resuelto la Conjetura de Hodge. Recuerden mis palabras.

[Sam Altman @sama]

@yacineMTB ok fine

[Dray @_drayito]

Esto va a ser hermoso. De verdad, siento la AGI.

[OpenAI @OpenAI]

This model represents a step-function improvement on many benchmarks, and its training is ongoing.

Our internal model group arrived at the Navier–Stokes solution in 88 hours, using around 10,000 coordinating AI agents.

Throughout the effort, we maintained the strict safeguards—including monitoring and isolation—that we apply to all our frontier evaluations.