it might sound woo woo, but radiating positive energy is the closest thing to magic i've found. tip generously, compliment strangers, share your knowledge with no expectation of anything in return. give like you have more than enough, and eventually you’ll find that you do.
I did something similar last year with llama 8B model, changed a neuron to update/delete targeted factual knowledge. I should prolly write something about it
if you have a qwen3.5 4b around, please try steering neurons L14 N8949 +1 and L13 N7956 -1
now you have evil qwen
recipe: dose × median(‖resid‖ leaving layer L, tokens 1:) / ‖W_down[:, n]‖` at the down_proj at every input
You're telling me Jewish folks thought if you arranged words and symbols systematically in the right way you can create intelligent golem entities and the two companies they founded to do this are worth several trillion?
For decades, researchers have sought materials that sort electrons by spin while their magnetism cancels.
In 3 days, 90+ Opus 5.5 agents helped us uncover two room-temperature magnetic semiconductor candidates in simulations: YBaMnFeO₅ and KV[Cr(CN)₆].
KV[Cr(CN)₆] was synthesized back in 1999. Its predicted ability to sort electrons by spin appears to have been hiding in plain sight for 27 years.
After co-inventing ChatGPT, I kept asking myself: why have superhuman chat models not led to AGI?
I’ve spent the last 2 years in stealth building a new way to train models (RLCD), and a new type of frontier AI model that we are releasing today: Jev
• 20-200x faster
• 40-400x cheaper (w/ output tokens free)
• Frontier composable intelligence optimized for decisions
AFAICT the shortest path to AI-based economic revolution
“MIT wants to rebuild education around the things AI can't replace. That means oral exams, semester portfolios, in-person project work, and a required social component in every subject. The report even floats the idea of rethinking grades entirely, since without a GPA to optimize, much of the incentive to cheat with AI evaporates.”
Hot take: too many talented AI researchers are focusing on code generation. There are many other interesting applications of AI that deserve more top talent.
We've received some feedback about a potential degradation of Opus 4.5 specifically in Claude Code.
We're taking this seriously: we're going through every line of code changed and monitoring closely.
In the meantime please submit any transcripts with issues through /feedback