@orangebook@Henriqueinvest It’s the feeling in the air you grasp in the most hidden yet exposed sides of the Japanese culture. It’s refreshing, it’s the next aim.
Long awaited glory days of Psych/NeuroSci are ahead. Not caring of social relevance, but interest gauging will 10x development fixing heavy structural research issues.
Un-exploring the explored through pioneerism.
@startingfromnix@isabelunraveled This is well-worded too: it being renewable vs finite opens up to the realm of cycling through waves rather than witnessing one as a continuum
@momahmood_ Once you’ll have it, you’ll want to go home and do the same over an extensive period of time, unless goal-dependency is strong enough. Context-switching is paradoxically critical.
@Jakekrajewski It’s even worse imo: the arrogance in living in a constant pedestal promotes their unilateral view. Their proclaimed edge is a product of their vision, so they don’t buy anything else. It’s a double-edged sword used to exterminate other views, which will eventually end them too.
Status of the debate is evolving fast. Pushing it away from the commonalities feeds fresh air in a vulcano of plausible views. Can still be lacking, but unexpectedly the most key part of Pinker’s take is saying “enough for today”, and he did not even mean to.
@RokoMijic@beffjezos “They start with a couple of assumptions, and lay out a chain of abstract reasoning, throwing in one dubious assumption after another, till they end up way beyond the land of experience or plausibility”
Nailed it Stephen Pinker
@SchrodingrsBrat Choice abundance mixed with high quality content distribution across infinite dimensions makes curiosity an expensive commodity at first glance, but with limit capacity in reality. Re-alignment will mean morphing into the mix or letting it go all once. Excited to see what will be
@Jakekrajewski Service add-ons will satisfy exploding sub services differentiation needs.
It won’t solve the problem, but will make customers more needy for time-saving options.
Good thing is higher value-chain thresholds for startups.
Walking through frameworks of structural mimicry limits the flow of how dynamic structures can naturally present themselves.
Such unexpected bias is predominantly identified away from magnifying glasses. It holds a genetic history, but brings inefficiencies with it.
One analogy AI researchers love is “planes don’t flap their wings but they still fly, so AI isn’t required to mimic the brain”. Well, I mostly agree with this.
But here’s a fun counter idea 😆. EPFL developed a robot bird (“ornithopter”) that flaps wings and lands on branch: 🧵
@ftlsid Upside is democratising people’s ability to show they can express themselves, hype will die down with large volumes (as it’s happening). Fear is follower thinking conglomeration, can distort and go dark very fast. Join the party too: you’d have a lot of interesting stuff to say
@ftlsid Keeping it simple must have helped: how do you deal with obsession over bottlenecks creating bigger problems until it’s too deep you can’t remember where you started? Frustration is a killer there.