o boy

I love space. Ill go one day.

[o boy @_oboyp]

@notch The three best options are:

Cursor
Claude Code
ChatGPT Codex

Claude and Codex are good if you only want to use that companies respective models with purpose built harnesses. Cursor is what will give you many different AI model options.

I recommend learning and trying all three

[o boy @_oboyp]

@bumpasshelll they don’t make em like they used to

[o boy @_oboyp]

@earthgohardd @dcrane2 @ZacksJerryRig Why are you posting here instead of on some Chinese social media?

[o boy @_oboyp]

@_Testflight_ @HalcyonHypnotic LOL

[o boy @_oboyp]

@_Testflight_ @HalcyonHypnotic @mightbejell0 LOL

[o boy @_oboyp]

@fx_szb @maks_1_1__ @Orbital_Perigee You’re retarded lmfao.

“At this pace” bro we did this shit more than a decade ago they are playing catchup. Keep larping homeslice.

[o boy @_oboyp]

@cultarr what’s second base

[o boy @_oboyp]

@TMFAssociates Should suffice for proving out the technology until the Vandenberg and Louisiana launch sites are ready

[o boy @_oboyp]

@RockettLord It is pathetic to look at a group of astronauts and the first thing you notice is gender, race, sexual orientation or whatever of the astronauts.

When selecting astronauts there is a very long list of things to worry about and identity isn’t anywhere near the top 10

[o boy @_oboyp]

@cultarr

[o boy @_oboyp]

@cultarr just date guys under 25

[Jared Isaacman @rookisaacman]

I understand some in the community have an affinity for specific hardware, but the focus should be on outcomes. With respect to SLS, the desired outcome is launching crewed Orion spacecraft at a reasonable cadence, rebuilding muscle memory, and buying down risk so we can land astronauts on the Moon. This is until such time as there are multiple crewed pathways that allow us to undertake lunar missions with even greater frequency and at lower cost, so that Artemis can live on for decades into the future.

The idea that Artemis II was only held up by the heat shield is not correct. Administrator Bill Nelson stated in December 2024, two years after Artemis I flew, that we would refly the same heat shield design on Artemis II, yet the mission did not fly until April 2026. On a side note, if leadership knew at the time that Artemis II would not launch until April 2026, it probably would have made sense to replace the heat shield altogether.

Even with as clean of a mission as Artemis II, it is hard to imagine waiting until 2028 to fly again and jump right to a lunar landing. SLS and Orion must launch with a reasonable cadence, and we need every opportunity to learn. That is why we added Artemis III, an easy trade against funding programs overbudget and behind schedule, in advance of a landing on Artemis IV.

You cannot point to the ML-2 structure and a single EUS tank and say it was “pretty much done" and you certainly have no specifics as to the suitability of stage adapter. The Government Accountability Office has been clear on the timing and remaining costs for both ML-2 and EUS, based on a history of OIG oversight reports. Simply put, we would be committing billions more to troubled programs when we can work cooperatively with the OEM and its joint venture to leverage an in-production upper stage with decades of flight heritage and get very good at turning ML-1. Of course, we retain the option of working with industry on ML-2, converting it to the SLS standard, or harvesting parts.

I am not here to favor companies or perpetuate underperforming programs. I do not want to throw away billions of taxpayer dollars, and time we do not have, on a flavor of a rocket that is not necessary to return astronauts to the moon. Those billions could go toward more Artemis missions or more science and discovery. Our focus must be on the immensely hard task of sending astronauts to the Moon with frequency and safely so we can land and stay.

Above all else, I care about outcomes, and so does the hardworking team at NASA, focused on delivering for the American people and everyone around the world who eagerly await the headlines we all experienced this past weekend.

[o boy @_oboyp]

@Jurassic_Liz @PCrudy @martyrdison If you’re dead what is him having your location gonna do?

[o boy @_oboyp]

@ThePrimalDino

[o boy @_oboyp]

@PapaStew80 @gunburd SpaceX is building the lunar lander for NASA. It will have an extremely similar control panel as Dragon does.

The lunar lander experiences all the same conditions as Orion and more, since it’s actually going to the lunar surface. It also spend more time in space than Orion.

[o boy @_oboyp]

@ThePrimalDino @skscartoon Starship is landing us on the moon in future Artemis missions. All SLS and Orion can do is go around the moon. Why did NASA spend so much time and money just making a spacecraft that can only go around the moon?

[o boy @_oboyp]

@zAlphii @gunburd Not how it works. They can do the entire mission without any screens.

Do you legitimately think NASA would sign off on them making dragon with screens if that was a possibility, or are you purposely being retarded?

[o boy @_oboyp]

@basedepicman @gunburd What do you think these inputs are actually going to? They all go to a flight computer. 200 cables for switches going into a computer or 3 cables for different screens, you’re not going to be opening these up in any cases.

[o boy @_oboyp]

@basedepicman @gunburd There are multiple screens. They can all display different things, or the same things. That’s the benefit of dynamic control panels.