loops

human

[loops @_smitop]

@Random501901 @NathanBomey using the mean deposit would not have made sense since it would be skewed by large market makers which aren't the focus of lawmakers Kalshi is responding to. And it doesn't really matter that they used mean instead of median for age? There are no ancient beings skewing avg age

[loops @_smitop]

@Random501901 @NathanBomey Kalshi is responding to a letter from lawmakers that requested that information, they didn't pick the metrics to use sua sponte

[loops @_smitop]

@redtachyon I have the same one!

[loops @_smitop]

@131pepe69 @eigenrobot yes, polymarket needs to start writing better market descriptions

[loops @_smitop]

@131pepe69 @eigenrobot Yes which means it can resolve as soon as the time period is over https://t.co/gubNvyrJ5m

[loops @_smitop]

@131pepe69 @eigenrobot this is how all PM markets work, UMA doesn't consider information that became known after the oracle request

[loops @_smitop]

@131pepe69 @eigenrobot this should totally be improved in the future

[loops @_smitop]

@131pepe69 @eigenrobot There's a UMA explorer where you can see all uma requests, e.g. here's a future MS request (the UI is really slow and janky, give it a while to load):

https://t.co/IQOP7OBNBA

[loops @_smitop]

@131pepe69 @eigenrobot the end date in the API is not a part of the UMA request (or clarifications) and is irrelevant

[loops @_smitop]

@131pepe69 @eigenrobot "sold by date X" is impossible to operationalize because we could learn about a sale arbitrarily long into the future. "sold by date X and known by date Y" is what PM should have done, but that's water under the bridge now.

[loops @_smitop]

@131pepe69 @eigenrobot but ultimately it's the trader's responsibility to understand how PM works. you should read and understand all of the underlying smart contracts before trading on PM. dyor.

[loops @_smitop]

@131pepe69 @eigenrobot polymarket often has poorly designed market rules that require you to think for a bit to understand them

[loops @_smitop]

@131pepe69 @eigenrobot this is how all PM markets work, UMA doesn't consider information that became known after the oracle request

[loops @_smitop]

@0xbobaaa This is not true at all, Polymarket doesn't have that rule (and does not have the technical ability to operationalize it; the PM smart contracts treat all shares in the same direction as fungible)

[loops @_smitop]

@bananamelter (maybe that's because I'm not Good?)

[loops @_smitop]

@bananamelter being Good is much harder than the other two things to demonstrate? being shiny doesn't require saying anything, and there are lots of legible ways to demonstrate skill. i have no idea how I could demonstrate the level of Good I am to someone else

[loops @_smitop]

@ianzepp @munchPRMR oh you're right 👍

[loops @_smitop]

@TheStithLord @packyM Like if Ant only counted their share of Bedrock revenue, then customers moving from Bedrock to 1P would significantly increase Ant's revenue even though that wouldn't actually represent any higher demand

[loops @_smitop]

@TheStithLord @packyM Ant's method is very reasonable. If Bedrock didn't exist most customers would use the 1P API (and have the full spend counted as revenue). there's no principled reason Bedrock tokens should be accounted for differently than 1P tokens in revenue

[loops @_smitop]

@BenShindel @thinkingshivers if it's so good for them to IPO why has it taken them so long? did it only start being good for everyone recently?