Classical liberal principles like equal treatment under the law and impartial enforcement seem sacrosanct when it comes to Samuel Sey and immigration law, yet when I ask even the most basic questions about “remigration” proposals, those principles suddenly cease to matter.
The Augsburg Confession specifies that fighiting the Turk, which the preface describes as the ancient enemy of Christiandom, is one of the legitimage uses of the sword.
Religion and peoplehood are sometimes intertwined.
@DJJenkins No worries. Your lack of engagement actually proves my point!
Centrist evangelicals really don't have the tools to engage even if they wanted to. In your case, I'm glad you have a pretense to bow out of the discussion.
This is the depth of thinking evangelism can muster for immigration and politics and general.
No demonstrated understanding (or in many cases, willful neglect) of actual policy and philosophical principals.