Anton Monakhov ([email protected])

[Anton Monakhov ([email protected]) @a48]

@arkenoi подожди, у сантехников же это в job description

[Anton Monakhov ([email protected]) @a48]

Энтузиастов, если ехать прямо, превращается в Николоямскую и сейчас проходит под Садовым и вообще не попадает на действительно довольно затейливую Таганскую, которая остается слева. если смотреть снаружи Садового, то на Таганскую площадь приходят Таганская улица (далее Нижегородская), Марксистская (далее Волгоградский), Воронцовская, Большие Каменщики (далее Симоновский вал).

[Anton Monakhov ([email protected]) @a48]

@BTobotras согласие с коммитом от ИИ лучше педалью как раньше, а не руками ;)

[stu 🥪🥞 @stutxo]

Today I call upon the precious metals industry to calmly begin planning for “meltdown mode”. My personal recommendation is to set in motion a controlled mass migration of gold to fresh bars, i.e. bars whose atomic structure has never been publicly exposed.

Holders, starting with large and sophisticated ones, should consider moving the bulk of their funds into bars that have never been assayed. And when they do assay one, they should melt their remaining holdings into a fresh bar (possibly using the same furnace).

Don’t rush. While I believe there is cause for action, a rushed migration would do more harm than good. Don’t panic either. Melting your gold is a simple, preventative step which does not require new physics or new vaults.

IMO it is now reasonable to brace for the possibility that alchemy breaks gold before asteroid mining, in the worst case in months not years. By “break” I mean fast lead-to-gold conversion (e.g. one tonne per week) on available hardware (e.g. a large cauldron cluster).

Recent days have been humbling for human metallurgical intuition. Long-held, unquestioned assumptions have fallen. In hindsight, lab-grown diamonds were our warning shot.

Yesterday’s OpenAI drop made it clear that alchemical superintelligence is upon us. They say there are weeks where decades happen. We are about to live through weeks where centuries of alchemical progress happen. Could our magic 79-proton atoms be too good to be true? Was it just scarcity through obscurity all this time?

Gold feels especially vulnerable to superintelligence. Atoms carry rich structure, with room for fancy tricks involving protons, neutrons and isotopes. Lead already has 82 protons. We are betting an entire store of value on nobody figuring out how to remove three.

Separately, Isaac Newton spent years researching alchemy. We should be open to the possibility that he was simply compute-constrained.

Also noteworthy is the striking under-representation of alchemical breakthroughs among the 722 mathematical results OpenAI published. I find it difficult to believe that none of them involved a philosopher’s stone. Backroom transmutation is my base case.

I urge large, sophisticated actors to lead by example. Fort Knox, the Bank of England and Peter Schiff have an opportunity to harden their bullion reserves. Next month I’ll address institutions in a live Q&A at an undisclosed castle.

Again, please do not rush. Holders with under 50 ounces enjoy partial cover from “Smaug’s shield”, i.e. his mountain of exposed bullion. Large vault operators should consider rotating their bars after every assay and/or adding a sphinx.

Exiting meltdown mode safely will require post-alchemical scarcity. My inclination is to go all-in on certified, naturally occurring gold with end-to-end geological verification. A single battle-tested “mined before AI” sticker yields plausible post-AI security.

The gold industry’s roadmap must now be revisited and accelerated in light of alchemical superintelligence. I’ll be pushing for maximum defensive calcination.

[Coinjoined Chris ⚡ @coinjoined]

When it comes to cryptography I'd rather listen to Justin Bieber or Drake individually

[Anton Monakhov ([email protected]) @a48]

And one more thing: if you don’t create a separate new account for each UTXO (which is technically possible, since Neoxa doesn’t require KYC), then even without consolidation, your UTXOs can still be grouped by address on the Neoxa side (it provides only one address and doesn’t allow you to change it—or at least I haven’t figured out how). Personally, I realized this out after a few transactions and only then created additional accounts.

[Anton Monakhov ([email protected]) @a48]

>I like this because it minimizes disturbing my BTC UTXOs. I can send 10 UTXOs to the exchange in one go and only have to move 1 on Bitcoin and no need to consolidate them if you don't want to. But they will be "linked" from a chain analysis perspective because they traveled in one TX on Blake chain, so it's better to group UTXOs from the same source together, and don't mix KYC and non-KYC coins in the same transaction if you can.

In addition to the issues with chain analysis, it’s also important to remember that a transaction on the Blake network would reveal the public keys of all UTXOs (in the case of P2PKH, P2SH, and P2WPKH), even if only one is moved on the actual Bitcoin network. The risk posed by quantum computing is purely theoretical for now, but it’s still something to consider.

[Anton Monakhov ([email protected]) @a48]

@giacomozucco @SeanObud111 @turtlecute33 @NeoxaPortal @peterktodd @ottosch_ But @ottosch_ CLI doesn't support multisig and/or cold wallets. Or are you just planning to send a pocket amount from a hot wallet? That said, there isn't exactly a lot of liquidity on Neoxa. For me personally, the locktime method has worked well so far.

[stu 🥪🥞 @stutxo]

shoutout to @bitcoincoreorg for upping the op_return limit so blockstream and the hacker can chat

[alp @alpacasw]

First image of the white hat have been released:

[Anton Monakhov ([email protected]) @a48]

@notgrubles it's a very popular place, I live nearby, but I've never actually been there

[Mr.Hodl @MrHodl]

No spam if no blocks

Oooga Booga

[Anton Monakhov ([email protected]) @a48]

@KLoaec @MrHodl Not only in light of this disaster, but imho it’s always useful to have a “watch-only” daemon for cold wallets with various types of notifications, such as this one: https://t.co/AWeZkVC5vM

[Anton Monakhov ([email protected]) @a48]

@StopAndDecrypt I personally use this https://t.co/AWeZkVC5vM (though I did have to tweak it a bit)

[Anton Monakhov ([email protected]) @a48]

@nopara73 @MrHodl my first reaction too

[Bit Paine ⚡️ @BitPaine]

they hash the tickers of every new shitcoin they listed in the prior week

they studied all other options and found no other process on earth with comparable scale and unpredictability

[Anton Monakhov ([email protected]) @a48]

@sharpone74 @Wood_sliver @JoeCarlasare most likely this is transaction in question: https://t.co/RStuuUKEy8 (two last symbols lost while pasting), destination is address of the thief (bc1qnk4zh9qcnap2mycp56qjrgza3cc8ylrh8fecp0).