i love how twitter will have ppl with usernames like "yieldcurvemyass69" and their analysis of macroeconomics contains a level of understanding that entire central bank research departments have nightmares about
$ZS Zscaler ($ZS) has historically been one of the most volatile, high-beta stocks in the entire technology sector. Looking at its 5-year price history, the stock has essentially formed a massive, volatile "double top" over the years, testing the $330–$370 range twice, only to crash violently back down to the $120–$130 range both times.
When the macro environment is flush with cash, investors price it like an unstoppable monopoly. When execution stumbles or interest rates stay high, the market aggressively strips away its premium multiple. Historically, buying Zscaler when its Revenue or FCF multiple compresses to the single digits (like right now) has been a highly profitable swing trade, while buying it when it approaches a $300+ price tag has left investors exposed to severe capital drawdowns.
Everybody sleeping on $NVTS right now.
It made it's move, the masses got excited, it pulled back, and the masses forgot about it.
One of my top watches right now.
$NOK Insider Buying Update 🚨
Chief of Staff Victoria Hanrahan just bought 44,682 shares at ~$15.81 average ($706K).
→ This is her first disclosed purchase.
→ Follows Owczarek’s (Chief Development Officer) ~$1M buy last week.
→ Over $3M in insider purchases in May alone, even after the stock is already up +127% YTD.
Insiders know what lies ahead for their Optical, IP and AI-RAN business - and are putting their own skin in the game.
You do not own enough $NOK.
$NOK is ~15% of my portfolio and I don't think it's enough. Adding more tomorrow.
https://t.co/pB4WtQYMRe
Reflecting on $NVTS Q1 2026 earnings.
Navitas delivered a good report. Revenue came in at $8.6M, above their
own guidance of $8.0-8.5M. Margins improved. They guided Q2 to $10M,
which is 16% growth from this quarter.
The stock is down about 5% after hours.
I'm holding my position. Because
the company is doing what it said it would do.
What does that mean?
Navitas is in the middle of a pivot. They're moving away from low-margin
phone chargers and toward high-power chips for AI data centers. That's
a hard transition and it shows up in the numbers as falling revenue
before it shows up as growing revenue.
This quarter showed the turn. High-power markets grew 35% year over
year and are now most of the business. Margins expanded because the
mix is improving. Q2 guidance points to continued growth.
That's what doing what they said they would do looks like. Slow,
sequential, not spectacular. But real.
Now I want to see Q2 confirm it.