@MayadeenEnglish@RoKhanna, I'm not American, but within bounds of legal rules, I will donate to a potential run. Two reasons:
1- You are a real progressive (not the Obama type)
2- Let's face it, American elections have an impact on other nations. Thus, we have a stake in the outcome.
@Bob_cart124@RedOrb4pal Your list and assessment are correct. If anything, il would say @FIFAcom is against poor nations. The problem we have is that the FAs of the victimised nations are bought and paid for by Infentino. So we can't expect any reactions. Only @FIFPRO / players boycott can help us
@theweefella1960@TouchmineX@georgegalloway Son, you just can't fathom how much anger people have against FIFA for the utter lack of respect they're showing to fans of all other nations (mostly third world countries like mine). So, yes, I pray for Karma to catch up with them.
They called the Vietnamese resistance fanatical.
They called the Iraqi resistance fanatical.
They called the Afghan resistance fanatical.
They called the Iranian revolutionaries fanatical.
They called the Palestinian resistance fanatical.
They have called every organized resistance to American military and political power, in every country, across eight decades, fanatical.
At what point does a pattern this consistent stop being a description of the people being labeled and start being a description of the labeler?
Fanaticism means: belief so extreme it has disconnected from rational motivation.
But the rational motivation is always there.
It is always visible.
It is always documented.
It is: you are here, in my country, with guns. I want you to leave.
That is not fanaticism.
That is the most basic political logic in human history.
The word "fanaticism" is what power reaches for when it refuses to follow that logic to its obvious source.
Which is: the guns.
Which is: the presence.
Which is: the empire itself.