Accelerationist

[Accelerationist @accelerate04]

But I don't understand how you want to solve the distribution problem, you claim only 0.1% of people use AI for work, few outside SF etc., but you realize the only people that will know your product exist is that exact bubble? Normies will use whatever drops into their existing enterprise products, you don't reach them by having a slightly better interface.

[Accelerationist @accelerate04]

@marsrepublica Why only 20-30? They should be capable of 50 V3s.

[Accelerationist @accelerate04]

The fact is many of those boycott or brand damage predictions turned out to be bs or highly exaggerated, so if you cannot back it up, I will not take it seriously.

And there is no scenario where BB2 is going to be cheaper lol. SpaceX will have launch cost 20-30x lower and their production benefit from mature manufacturing, existing components and extensive vertical integration.

[Accelerationist @accelerate04]

@GuywithUmbrella @danheld @garrytan They will get to that level once they start deploying their Next Gen D2C sats next year, and Starship cadence and their mature manufacturing capabilities means they can pull ahead quick.

[Accelerationist @accelerate04]

@TeslaDude12 @IscheSteven @StockSavvyShay This is related to their higher orbit, it has nothing to do with power.

[Accelerationist @accelerate04]

@Kris2214579 @kingtutcap No they don't. Look at the recent Tesla boom in Europe or Starlink boom in liberal countries such as NZ. 2025 was maybe somewhat of an exception since he was constantly in the news, but since then mainstream coverage has dropped dramatically and people forget quick.

[Accelerationist @accelerate04]

@HeeraniPK ASTS would need ground gateways in the Antarctica region as they have no ISL.

[Accelerationist @accelerate04]

V3 was delayed by Starship, but Starship is nearing completion, it's next flight (this month) will likely deploy V3 sats into their actual orbit, so basically demonstrate the full capability needed. By the time they plan to deploy V2 Mobile in H2 2027, it will likely have scaled cadence and not be the bottleneck. And satellite production is much more predictable than mastering a super heavy rocket.

[Accelerationist @accelerate04]

@friedshrimpoboy @BeamBillion @PolymarketMoney Muh Mars timeline. The entire aerospace sector is regularly late. Ariane, Neutron, BB2, Amazon LEO deployment target etc. Way behind schedule, and those are much less ambitious goals.

The point is that SpaceX has still outperformed everyone else.

[Accelerationist @accelerate04]

@1MoreSmithHere @grok Is service speed and data density the same claim or are those different claims?

[Accelerationist @accelerate04]

@BeamBillion @PolymarketMoney Yeah the guy who got reusable rockets a decade before anyone else, has more active satellites in orbit than anyone else and dominates global mass to orbit, never delivers.

[Accelerationist @accelerate04]

@gabriberton The guy is a joke, he is also still pretending like he is boycotting X, when he lost that battle a long time ago and is clearly too addicted to the platform.

[Accelerationist @accelerate04]

Starship will almost certainly get to thousands of flights a year. They are at over 150 flights with a partially reusable rocket, where they have to throw away the second stage every single time. Starship was from the beginning designed to have a far higher cadence than Falcon 9, in terms of both production, launch pad and rocket design.

Also no your theory makes no sense, perimeter assessments are already conservative and the NG explosion did not show that Methane was unexpectedly powerful.

[Accelerationist @accelerate04]

@BiggustheRoman @SpaceInvestor_D Makes no sense, no it's because they want to get to thousands of Starship flights a year and use their capital advantage to secure the best launch sites.

[Accelerationist @accelerate04]

@azatht @jeff_foust It's not SpaceX lmao, it's crypto bros that want to have the associated Solana token be pumped.

[Accelerationist @accelerate04]

@Joonzzy @Staudinger333 How are you suppose to know what VC companies will do? SPCX is one of the most future proof companies out there, many of those have it in the long-term.

[Accelerationist @accelerate04]

@dennis_nik75 @niccruzpatane @SpaceX I mean Falcon 9 is cheaper than the image claims not that it's cheaper than Starship.

[Accelerationist @accelerate04]

@matamasksean @Teslaconomics 1. They do not need exotic heat radiator, as they will have an extremely low launch cost with Starship
2. The satellite is specifically designed to handle regular chips via shielding mass
3. Wrong, they can accept a certain failure rate per satellite, just like with Starlink