@AndreasSteno@Rory_Johnston Alarmism sells subscriptions. Being wrong is one thing, having no humility to reflect on the why is shocking for an “analyst”.
@AndreasSteno The issue is the barrel counters make it sound like a science which makes how far off they’ve been even more shocking. If you’re gonna say “look at the math” at least do it correctly.
@vcsgrizzfa2075@Rory_Johnston I pressed him for a trade 7 weeks ago when he was peddling the 200 dollar alarmism - the reply was “that’s not his job”. Then he went on a podcast tour peddling this same hyperbole. All I ask for is a for either clarity (this is my timeframe) or humility (why i got this wrong)
@vcsgrizzfa2075@Rory_Johnston Longer than we can be solvent? All forecasts must come with a time frame otherwise with a long enough timeframe everything is certain. So what is the time frame and what is the trade, and are people who were listening to him 7 weeks ago ok after being -25% ?
@Rory_Johnston April 200 calls looking good there,mate ? Or you’ve joined the “the tradeable instruments don’t represent reality, I was always talking about spot barrels no one can trade” camp?
Lifecycle of Oil Analysts
- Oil will go to 200 if strait closed for a month but not sure what the trade is
- Actually look at the cracks instead
- Actually we meant Dated Brent OBVIOUSLY it’s almost 200 just 50% away
- Actually nvm, hopefully you’re still paying for substack
@STIR_Trader_@Gamma_Blast_ It’s not really roll but central bank pricing. Quite misleading to look at the front end in static rolldown terms because it almost trades like sticky dates via the fomc steps.