Solicitor. Father of 3. Interests include regulation, administrative, energy and competition law. Also triathlon. Views my own, RT is not an endorsement.
@ashwingop@marro_bert@711friedchicken@peterdao Not at all. The output of AI coding is code that works. The output presumably you wanted from your post is for people to read it and be persuaded. Different jobs, different tools. Or tool, in this case.
@ashwingop@marro_bert@711friedchicken@peterdao You asked for the point… it’s that you have given up your own intellectual capability & voice.
When you don’t take the time to write/at least adapt to your own voice, it makes people doubt that it’s your view and undermines legitimacy of asking people spend time to read it.
SovCit style website must pay man £23k after he completed their so-called “No Obligation Challenge”, court rules
“The Defendant's views are, of course, complete legal nonsense” said DDJ Blitz
https://t.co/yxz48haCwC
I’m an appellate court judge with 29 years in the law. I’ve read more briefs than I can count.
Strong arguments are crucial.
But they’re not enough.
If you overtax the judge’s brain, you’re less persuasive.
Here are three tips to write for the judge’s brain instead of against it. Thread. 🧵
@writeclimbrun Yes, forwarding is the way. I once worked for a partner who would attach a .msg copy of an email to a new email to the client.
That was much worse, because the client would inevitably get exercised by reading the attachment and hit reply all to that with their candid thoughts.
Mark your calendars! 🗓️
The 2025 federal election will be held on Saturday 3rd May.
Enrol: https://t.co/G9K2W3wael
Update: https://t.co/AeIsPHjfEe
Check: https://t.co/cmfdlDZ2xi
Work for us: https://t.co/jQ0ffaymtJ
Emily Wilson spent years explaining how a lot of the older translations weren’t translating the actual poem but riffing off each other only for people to come around because of Nolan and think the other translations are more accurate because they sound “older”