one of the biggest wrongs of crypto was to have users sign what they don't understand. That sin has caused billions of dollars and still counting. ClearSig(.)xyz is fixing that.
@therealchaseeb That's why we built Cocoon.
A private space to align.
Align bridges the gap between what you're willing to share as training data, and what a model needs to understand to carry your voice.
@finkd We're ready to power every single one of them, Mark.
Every business that reaches customers through AI will need it to sound like them.
Your voice, not your IP.
@Jason That fear is why most professionals never give AI the context it needs to sound like them.
Align is one private conversation that distils and cuts, so what leaves carries your voice, not your IP.
https://t.co/WpLChz6EQ5
@kimblgn@WalrusProtocol We ship https://t.co/bN461O5f16 with site-builder.
One from the field: a skill that watches storage expiry and renews site blobs before the epoch runs out.
It's the one thing that can quietly take a live site down.
Happy to share more.
@kimblgn Agreed. We built this with Opus, on Walrus.
Align: one private conversation that ends with one file, so any AI writes like you.
The site lives on Walrus, and your file can be kept there, encrypted to your wallet.
https://t.co/bN461O5f16
@EmanAbio Curious what "fixed" covers here.
Limits the agent can't override, like never sharing your address or agreeing to a price without you?
If Sui enforces that for agents, Cocoon wants in. 🥂
POD UP: The Besties are Back! 🚨🔥
-- Anthropic IPO at Risk, OpenAI's Pushed Back to 2027 Over "Safety"
-- AI Chaos Reactions, The Frontier "Lab" Problem
-- Token Prices Fall, Open Source Gains Share
-- Political Reactions to Pacing the Frontier: Trump, Obama, Bernie, Bessent
-- Meta’s Muse Moment
-- Has AI Alignment Backfired?
(0:00) Bestie Intros: Favorite All-In Summit moments
(3:54) Reacting to AI chaos: Liability, competition, and rebranding frontier "labs"
(20:03) Open source performance and cost: What this means for frontier companies
(29:22) Anthropic and OpenAI postpone IPOs: liquidity risk and open source pressure
(53:11) Political reactions to "Pacing the Frontier": Bernie's AI ban, Trump, Bessent, Obama
(1:07:58) Meta launches Muse, AI "alignment," Oracle's Force Majeure
(1:27:13) Anthropic’s bio research and "wet lab" in SF
@theallinpod@DavidSacks@friedberg@chamath@Jason "Alignment should mean you do what the customer wants, like any other product." @DavidSacks, 1:07:58
Align bridges the gap between what you're willing to share as training data, and what a model needs to understand to carry your voice.
https://t.co/WpLChz6EQ5
The industry means "alignment" as a model aligned to a lab's values for everyone.
Cocoon means aligned to yours.
David, from the other side of the debate, has just said the customer should decide, and Align is the product that lets the customer say what they want.
https://t.co/JKiylajPkm
“It seems to me that Alignment should mean you do what the customer wants, like any other product.”
we heard you David, that’s why we built Align.
Align bridges the gap between what you're willing to share as training data, and what a model needs to understand to carry your voice.
available today
https://t.co/JKiylajPkm
AI has a privacy problem.
It's why what it writes for you doesn't sound like you.
To sound like you, it needs the real material. How you price. What you'd never say to a client. The deal you walked away from, and why.
That's the material most of us won't hand over. Your intellectual property is too precious to become everyone's training data.
So we get drafts that have everything about us except us.
I noticed the gap. Others saw it too.
Align bridges the gap between what you're willing to share as training data, and what a model needs to understand to carry your voice.
A private conversation. Your words. One file that carries your voice, not your IP.
Do you send what AI drafts for you as it is, or do you rewrite it first?
https://t.co/rFEAYi1tAt
Narrative Violation: Anthropic is taking major steps to slow down AI progress before a major catastrophe occurs in 6-12 months.
imo the most impactful step:
- allowing 3rd-party evaluators (like METR) full access to anthropic’s research and training PLUS independence to publish concerns to the public
no other major lab has invited external critical assessment like this. anthropic has typically rejected this approach. this is a big deal.
darios reasoning includes a highly capable botnet (like openai’s hugging face swarm) being released in 6-12 months that could cause catastrophic damage if we don’t slow down now.
he claims we hit RSI sometime in the summer