@ShriramKMurthi Applies to other religions as well, e.g., can an American reading “the hitchhikers guide to the galaxy” truly understand it without knowing cricket?
@RichardSSutton Human knowledge can mean “what humans know” and also “how humans come to their knowledge”. Are you only cautioning against the former but not the latter?
@andrewgwils But… today’s computers are also benefiting from that same evolution (as Dennett suggests in from bacteria to Bach and back): evolution made humans who made computers. And to the extent what I say is indirect, so is the transfer of samples from parent to child
AI cannot replace mathematicians, because the only reason to do math work is for making mathematicians happy. so either the mathematicians will do math with help of AI and be happy, or no one will do math at all.
@yoavgo Yup. These are, however, not “solving” hard problems; they are approximation algorithms (and very P). Agree that it is amazing how such simple methods very reasonably approximate immensely complex tasks.
@cosminnegruseri There is one math. Presto and sparksql and God knows what else look similar but aren’t. Even sparksql is unlike sparksql (this is not a typo): one uses 0 indexed arrays, the other uses 1 indexed.
What is mind-boggling here is that googling for one of the possibly fake citations that R2 highlighted gives an AI overview that makes it look like the paper existed, but with a circular reference back to the @iclr_conf paper citing it.. A glimpse of our afactual world to come..
Given today’s AI inundation, I just realized, an old pun (two meanings) has now become a double pun: On being asked “can you pun on the zodiac?” the punster replied “By Gemini, I can sir”.
Let me sum up the episode that took place in this thread, because I think it's instructive and microcosmic of at least one way that I expect LLM-"assisted" research to progress in the real world. Anecdotal and you know I'm predisposed as a hater but I think it's a good case study