@KnisterPeter @digitalkaoz Deno has a JSX transform that seems to limit the amount of objects for SSR: https://t.co/1vli8jYP8n never tried it but looks promising.
@itsmejaypea @mattpocockuk Yes. It's on a level of dangerous with "any" and "as". But since it's just a tiny exclamation mark and fewer devs even know about it, easy to get bitten by it.
@hot_girl_spring@Dishpit @averagerbxusers The latest versions of TypeScript will also infer type assertions without writing down the types explicitly, and then it's normal Javascript again, which TS can still check.
@no_decaf_pls@ejdickson Yeah and the comics in those books are mostly from Italy. But then do Germans like Donald because they got the material from Italians who im turn like him. Or is there so much about him because everyone likes him more 🤔
@MrAkumaMaou@pascalsohler@historyinmemes There were 4 of this kind, almost identical buildings. Two were demolished and are gone, so it is possible. This one and one in Berlin could not be demolished because of their surroundings. Interestingly, they planned for that and built them with windows 🤷 I visited both btw.
@Aron_Adler@ziggurism Prisma ORM from JS world let's you do this. You edit the schma file and it generates migrations from the diff.
But it's feels limited.
ActiveRecord from Rails has an interesting concept where you declare migrations in a imperative style DSL but they can also run backwards.
@jevakallio@GitHubCopilot Looks better IMO 🤷 and you save the time reading through arguments and comments. But yeah, you won't know if it is correct what copilot is saying. In the end it moves you from writing things to reviewing.
@SachaGreif@tobmaster Yes. Or you can do React.ComponentProps<typeof Child>, also in combination with Pick<>, Omit<> to avoid relying on outside type files. But maybe you are doing "prop drilling" too much and you can move suitable code to layout/wrapper components with props that accept elements.
I grew up in a European culture. My equivalent of Newsweek had a naked man and woman on the cover at one point.
Americans are prudes who can't differentiate general nudity from grooming and conflate the two because rubbing brain cells together to understand intent is "hard"
@sailor_dude Viel krasser finde ich dass das tatsächlich bis 1997 in Deutschland die Rechtslage war und Leute wie Seehofer und Merz gegen das neue Gesetz gestimmt haben. https://t.co/BIjJ48yhRS
@mattpocockuk@noamisaac @turalowski I think not many people define it this way around. You also get multiple roots that way, which is not usually the case in a tree. Maybe reconsider your definition to not create more misunderstandings?