@bottlecrow_@homolumen@bronzeagemantis Yeah it’s a very good response I hadn’t had any convos since 5.1 about this, I was previously disappointed w fable 5….
@Pong0Pong0@bronzeagemantis True on how their trained and context poisoning coming into play both in training and during search.
OTOH I was actually surprised by the quality of fable 5.1 max’s output when instructed to assess fukuyama’s claims on bap, purely based on its representation of bap’s beliefs.
@homolumen@bronzeagemantis Fable:
Fukuyama is right about hierarchy, and mostly right about religion — BAP is a Nietzschean who holds Christianity's leveling instincts and the Christian right in open contempt, even if his vitalism has a pagan, mythic register that isn't secular in the ordinary sense.
@igelblork Sure, we could keep making our “faster horses” but at some point things are moving as fast and efficiently as humans can consume and any gains can either be marginal or even selected against.
For the love of god will someone tell me what these “novel industries” that AI will open up are? Even take a stab at it? The set of possible industries is constrained by human nature and from a biological perspective it seems that “industry state space” has been fully explored.
@igelblork Sure it will free people up from their current labor, but I asked what new industries might be born and you respond with “capable intellectual capital will discover new industries”… industry space is human-shaped and pretty exhaustively covered already imo
@homolumen@bronzeagemantis Straussian-trained Yale PhD whose dissertation was on Nietzsche, Plato and tyranny, would probably take the comparison as a compliment.
One caveat: this is from memory of the book and his commentary, so treat the specific attributions as paraphrase rather than quotation.
@homolumen@bronzeagemantis beauty, strength, breeding — not something a government could legislate. That makes him an almost perfect specimen of Strauss's 1941 nihilists: a moral-aesthetic revolt against the open society, certain of what it hates and silent about what should replace it. Alamariu, a
@homolumen@bronzeagemantis I’d love to see fable 5.1 max with no memory assess fukuyama’s claims about BAP strong government support… with a non-leading prompt and guidance to answer from its knowledge of bap without searching id be shocked if it had a nuanced take on the matter. Maybe an experiment I do
@bronzeagemantis This bitter coating is what blocks LLM from engaging with your work. Once handed transcripts from CR, BAM, and SS they show extreme surprise at depth and persuasiveness of arguments… as with normies it’s a problem of getting your thoughts past filters and into their context.
@bronzeagemantis I’ve been around them, I don’t respect them but there’s a difference between indigestion (pseud) and spitting something bitter out. As you point out in recent ep, many of this class have same “spit out” reaction to Christianity, which is why left tries to tar by association.
@bronzeagemantis You’ve purposefully shrouded your work in such an outrageous/forbidden aesthetic that I don’t think you can fairly expect “serious” public commentary from engaging… There’s benefits to growing an ideology “in the shade” but you surely don’t expect actual engagement from critics
@thinkingshivers You just iterate on results, either fresh prompt or on same image until you get a wonky artifacted image that looks like your mental image. Then you have the model turn your process into a fresh prompt… it’s a dyadic relationship to find where in prompt space an image lies…