@BobMurphyEcon@ComicDaveSmith Hoppe argued a road homesteader should grant access easements to prior users. Our ep. #ana035 argued this should be a public easement for many govt roads. Easement is only for established uses so conflicting uses are cause for eviction.
+ a dope rap intro
https://t.co/hwufPYCVCx
@shortmagsmle I fainted and fell on top of my wife's belly upon the sight of the tray with all of the implements for the epidural, it was just like in the hostel movies.
They made me sit in a chair for the rest of the delivery.
beautiful, mind-bending piece by T.J. Clark arguing that palaoelithic art like the chauvet caves were a reaction to the rising hegemony of language over thought — a counter-proposal that attempted to dissolve the linear, hierarchical structure of language https://t.co/Tq039iAiSH
BREAKING: Tonight, a United Airlines flight from Newark to Tel Aviv is set to carry onboard 5 cargo shipments destined for the weapons giant Elbit Systems.
Past shipments by United — on passenger flights! — have included parts for fighter jets and tanks https://t.co/TWg1CsHPzO
I am perennially baffled by people who think they can make a living doing a hobby.
If you enjoy math, become an engineer and contribute real value to society.
Do these brain teasers in your spare time for fun.
I’m about to give a lecture to the Columbia Math Dept, but honestly I just wanna ask THE STUDENTS how they feel about AI frontrunning their life’s work & each other. 😂 Here’s what happened in plain English:
2 groups of mathematicians made a lifetime breakthrough one of the most famous problems that had gone unsolved for almost 100 years.
But they only solved a much easier version of the problem w/lots of AI assistance, & then a false rumor went around that Anthropic had solved the problem because one of the authors was working at Anthropic lmao.
So then OpenAI decided to frontrun them & spend $20 million of compute to solve the problem. 😏
And since it’s a famous problem there’s a $1M prize for it like the Nobel.
Then the OpenAI dude told the group leader you can share the prize with us & we’ll even let you claim first authorship but you need to drop the name of your Anthropic coauthor from the paper.
Then the group leader got mad because that’s super unethical & felt like they secretly used his ChatGPT data to figure out what he was working on to frontrun him. At least that’s the Anthropic perspective.
The problem is so hard that the original two authors would’ve gotten a top math prize & generational prestige for just solving the easier version.
But OpenAI just brute forced it while seemingly stealing their idea and being unethical and everything.
If not for the drama the scientific achievement would’ve been comparable to curing a form of cancer in their field‼️
But instead no one’s questioning that it got solved, & instead it devolved into this shitshow. 😌
Now a lot of mathematicians are saying the hardest problems that they spend a lifetime working on are gonna get solved in a year or two. 🙃
And some mathematicians are now saying it’s like doping and they should ban using AI on some types of problems to “maintain the challenge.”
@Lib_Development In Australia they call them "datacentres" which is a constant validation of our choice to turf out the redcoats back in the old country.
(or is it "red coats")
But this doesn't happen, whether through malice or incompetence.
So there is a trade off between
(a) enforcing immigration and dealing with those problems, or
(b) allowing immigration and dealing with those problems.
Sheer numbers can shift the "lesser evil" from b to a.
The cato guy misses the point of course . The analogy to drug prohibition is that it creates perverse incentives. Human trafficking, etc.
In #ana035 we argued that enforcement should be against all crime, vagrancy, etc.