I finally converted my notebook for calculating a statistical significance test (permutation test) into a blog post - no fluff, just plain simulation.
https://t.co/yHn4HxXKDK
@github involved a top notch OSS contributor to build integration with their product for one of major editors from ground up.
https://t.co/Bt1RwkNdP2
It’s a pinnacle of efficiency & a pleasant surprise.
i always thought that if a person belives there is a problem worth solving, he works on it/funds himself first. i guess this guy has all resources he might need if he really believes this being a problem.
@Smocks4m @levelsio There is a Beckham law tax regime (aka flat 24% tax on any income from Spain/no tax on financial gains outside Spain) that makes live in there at least bearable. Requirements: need to apply when relocating, works only for 6 years. https://t.co/HamAfiPjnA
another reason why locals are not interested in these jobs might be that there is a great supply of cheap labor on these jobs and it's driving wages down.
most likely industries will adapt rather than collapse. right now they plainly take advantage of cheap (and often illegal) workforce. right now their incentive is to exploit the cheap workforce as much as possible.
it's not clear why they were admitted to US in the first place. more likely they allied with US to serve their interests not just of goodness of their heart. They should live with the consequences of their actions and don't expect partner bail them for the rest of their lives because they were allies in this venture.
yeap, EM L4/L5 make a perfect sense to put a large station as they are stable, no need to spend fuel increase the orbit, may be only occasionally and there are no 16 heatup/cooldown cycles per day putting strain on station body.
a drawback is that it's outside Earth magnetosphere.
@beffjezos@elonmusk@peterrhague@Space_Station@SpaceX but what for? L1, L2, L3 are not stable outside 3 body model, L4, L5 are quite far away (1au), more over L3 is the on opposite side of the earth orbit (2au)
L1 and L2 are much closer but still 5x distance to the moon and you need fuel to maintain position
Meant that US airforce F is not a very reliable "airline" in terms of accidents, would not recommend
FY2020: 72 total mishaps (29 Class A, 43 Class B). 7 deaths, 14 aircraft destroyed. Notable: A-29 crash causing permanent disability, C-130J hard landing ($23.6M damage).
FY2021: 63 mishaps (21 Class A, 42 Class B). 4 deaths, 8 aircraft destroyed. Notable: T-38 crash in Alabama killed two pilots. Class A mishaps dropped, Class B rose.
FY2022: 67 mishaps (24 Class A, 43 Class B). Notable: F-35A crash in Utah, T-38C crash in Mississippi (bird strike). Unmanned mishap rates improved.
FY2023: 75 mishaps (29 Class A, 46 Class B). 2 deaths, 10 aircraft destroyed (6 MQ-9s). Notable: MQ-9 crash killed a contractor; T-38 nose gear collapse. Highest mishap count in five years.
FY2024–2025 (Partial): Limited data. Notable: F-35 crash in Alaska (Jan 2025), KC-135 gear collapse in Kansas (May 2024).
Class A (fatalities, aircraft destruction, or damages over $2.5M) and Class B (damages $600K–$2.5M, partial disability, or multiple hospitalizations)