@Abdi__Hossein@SharifiZarchi میگن ادب از که اموختی از بی ادبان، الان دارم بهت هم درس ادب میدم هم درس اینکه، تایین کننده ش من نیستم، تایین کنندش عقل شعوره که شما ازش بهره نبردی، درس آخرمم بهت پسر سایبری گلم اینه که هم تو هم رفیقات و هم اون دولتی که براش میخوری با هم میتونین کیرمو بخورین
@Abdi__Hossein@SharifiZarchi غیر اخلاقی واقعی، این مقایسه ی بدون بنیاد و اساس شماست. آیا کسی گفت چین خوبه؟
کجای دنیا آزادی بیان و اینترنت دقیقا جزوی از حق های اولیه ی انسان نیست؟ اصن بر فرض که دولتی مث اونی که شما براش میخوری اومد اینترنت رو قطع کرد و ابلهی مثل شما هم گفت به به، باز اینترنت حق طبیعی میمونه.
Introducing TurboQuant: Our new compression algorithm that reduces LLM key-value cache memory by at least 6x and delivers up to 8x speedup, all with zero accuracy loss, redefining AI efficiency. Read the blog to learn how it achieves these results: https://t.co/CDSQ8HpZoc
A Stanford student got reported for academic misconduct last semester.
His research paper was so good his professor assumed he bought it.
The academic integrity hearing lasted 3 hours.
Here's what happened in that room.
The panel asked him to explain his methodology from scratch. He opened his laptop, pulled up https://t.co/7NsPvmOCXF, and started rebuilding the entire paper live in front of them.
First he fed it his raw notes and asked: "You are a research methodology expert. Here are my raw notes. Identify the 3 strongest arguments buried in this data, rank them by originality, and show me exactly where each one challenges or extends existing literature."
The professors went quiet.
Then he ran: "Now simulate a hostile peer reviewer with a PhD in this field. Generate every serious objection they would raise against my thesis. Then tell me which objections actually have merit and which ones I can dismantle."
One professor leaned forward and asked him to stop so she could write down the prompt.
He kept going. "Take my weakest argument and steelman it harder than I did. Show me what it would look like if it were airtight. Then tell me what I'd need to prove to get it there."
Then the one that ended the hearing. "You are my thesis advisor. I have 24 hours before submission. Read this draft and tell me the single change that would move this from a B+ to an A. Be brutal."
He walked them through how he'd used that last output to rewrite his conclusion three times until it held up under every objection in the room.
What took most PhD candidates 6 months of back-and-forth with advisors, he was doing in real-time inside a single workflow.
The panel didn't just clear him.
They gave him the highest grade in the department's history and asked him to present the workflow to faculty.
The irony is beautiful. The paper looked too good to be human because he'd found a way to think harder than most humans bother to.
That's not cheating. That's the new ceiling.
Tweeted with caption:
"Tehran, Iran, Last days of 2025. A man protesting the economical situation"
Some people are saying this reduces the protests to "Economic" issues.
No! This is a protest against the whole regime. We want total change, as we wanted in all previous uprisings.
@AnHeartist@atensnut I 1000% agree with you, however if one day she decides to take her hijab off and join them, wouldn’t it now be imposed upon her by her husband for 90% of the time (can’t tell me not, I come from a muslim country)