@rand_longevity Just because a company says they are producing more stuff doesn't mean we are approaching the singularity.
Especially when that company greatly benefits from advertising such. Like this tweet.
@HowToAI_ Something is wrong with your understanding. Nvidia is not negatively impacted by this.
It is like saying Intel is done for because compilers can roll better assembly than the average human.
Total nonsense. It's good for Nvidia.
Let's get this straight, AI ROI is NOT real, but the orders to build the AI infrastructure IS real. So you buy the "picks and shovels" companies building AI, but not the companies using AI.
We were told the exact same thing back in Y2K.
And for a while it was true.
But when the DotComs imploded, investors eventually realized who is going to buy all of this equipment?
One difference I will note, is that I don't recall anyone being "against" the internet being built.
@wesbos Its basically a totally useless set of models. They're not good at coding. They're not open weight. The image generation is stable diffusion level.
There is no actual redeeming quality to these models when it comes to actual users using models.
They're more expensive than C2.5!
@HSVSphere@abdimoalim_ The intent is much weaker, than that in C++.
Cast to rvalue reference, then let the overload resolution choose the correct function. That's all.
Assuming anything more can lead to nasty bugs, have to dumb down the thinking.
@zetalyrae True and not true. We are resource constrained now, so everything has slowed down.
I mean, literally, we are running out of capacity to produce chips fast enough to meet the demand. Not to mention we are going to eventually be energy constrained as well, which is the hard-limit.
@swyx@Santiag18027886@george__wing No its not. That model was February 2025. That chart tracks with model release date, not when the model was trained.
@scaling01 Seriously though, what are the sources for these figures?
They can't just be making stuff like this up. This is their competitors in a chart.
If it is made up and they don't specify they are some estimates(e.g. bullshit they made up), then it's grounds for a lawsuit.
@VictorTaelin This is what we are seeing in big companies. Engineers are getting big boosts work where they can already envision the output well.
But it can be totally destructive in exploratory work where you have to actually work through ideas and express what you are thinking.
Vibe Coding a AAA Racing Game with ThreeJS Day 3+4
✅ Skinned Terrain
✅ Better terrain generators
✅ GLB props
✅ Procedural props (wind turbines, bridges, electricity poles)
✅ Road guard rails and curve arrows
✅ A lot more map editor tools
✅ Better Water (might delete, FFT burns my toaster)
✅ First post processing
✅ A lot of stuff no one cares about but i had to do
@rfleury Well, the codebase is modern C++. Some asserts really saved our asses.
If we dont fail fast during system integration in a codebase this large we could spend weeks trying to find what is causing the weird state.
Yes it's not optimal. That's why Rust is pushed as an alternative.