@FlareMafioso fassets collateral requirements will drive the actual buy pressure. locking flr to back non-smart contract tokens means the supply gets constrained purely by system demand, regardless of what the broader market is doing.
@TheGrungieNFTs the main issue is most people judge chains on transaction speed instead of data access. having ftso and fdc built directly into the consensus layer changes how dapps consume external state.
@IroIbeGodswill7@0xc06@FlareNetworks robinhood listing solves the fiat ramp problem for a lot of retail. most people still don't know how to bridge, so getting native exposure in a major app makes it easier to funnel capital into the network.
@XRPWatcherJanus native oracles completely change how we design liquidations. on other chains you have to build massive buffers for oracle latency during market crashes. on flare the block-level state updates mean you can run tight margins safely.
this is the right framing. xrpl for clean asset issuance, flare for the data/proof layer, tee for confidential settlement. keeps each layer doing what it's actually good at instead of forcing everything into evm-shaped boxes.
institutional flows don't care about your chain maximalism. they care about clean separation of concerns.
ftso data providers been submitting consistently for months now. the redundancy is actually working, price feeds haven't hiccupped even during high volatility.
@TheGrungieNFTs fcc is actually the thing that separates flare from every other l1. tee-based compute with cross-chain payments built in, not some bolted-on bridge.