@AdamSinger maybe permavibecession would have been more appropriate but it’s clunky
sort of meta to get upset about something that isn’t upsetting here
@Chris_arnade canada has disappointed in many ways, but shale was an exogenous shock. it’s less about barrels produced and more about not being where all western capex goes when wti>70 anymore
@pkedrosky if i’m reading this right… 2 coal mines, 2 coal generators, and an oil refinery? incidental methan emissions maybe not coming from methane usage?