@CrosslandCreate @The80HDkid@no_earthquake Alastair Macintyre has made some of the same critiques as you but presents a possible alternative conclusion. Did you find that his arguments also do not hold water? Or are you simply uninformed on the subject?
@conjurial@michael_wiebe@Tyler_A_Harper Perhaps my interpretation of TAH is too charitable in assuming a basically pro-science position. Also… maybe TAH was just making a joke and wasn’t being “aggressively anti-intellectual.”
@conjurial@michael_wiebe@Tyler_A_Harper I’m sure you would observe the opposite or no effect if you conducted a study that varied the appropriate factors. That is the point: the study only confirms what we already know to be true under normal circumstances. Science is nonsense insofar as it fails to do more.
@conjurial@michael_wiebe@Tyler_A_Harper Its not anti-intellectual to expect "social" science to go further than confirming what we already know from observation. Its not "we don't need science to know this" its "we need science to go further than confirming what we already know."
@Noahpinion Physics has shown that the presence of an atmosphere affects the objects under study, and that is how science is valuable. The marijuana study is nonsense if it confirms our observations without illuminating the general forces at work.
@Noahpinion This critique is unfair. The social science study is nonsense insofar as it establishes what we already know. It doesn't tell us anything about the laws that govern the situation. A physics study showing that heavy objects fall faster than lighter objects would also be nonsense.
@GayPatriot@kylegriffin1 The Indian-American part of her identity is the part that was unprecedented, not the Black part. How is this hard to understand?
The thing is orange man really is bad but Biden ain't got what it takes to beat him (or govern) - what to do? May I suggest: a tripartite system of government mirroring the divisions of the human psyche in which power is invested in the faculty of reason, as represented by philos
@StrifeDead@empireenjoyer10@whstancil The idea that people can live happy lives without excessive consumption is the truly radical position here. The poor man is not the man who has little, but the man who desires much.
@StrifeDead@empireenjoyer10@whstancil Your implicit characterization of DoorDash, a new phone, an expensive vacation, etc as definitive of “hobbies, entertainment, and joy” is a greater reflection of a capitalist mindset than the view you are attempting to critique.
The funniest thing about this is that this person was going to biglaw in the first place. You build this public image bleating about how revolution requires killing civilians or whatever and meanwhile your own life centers around banking $235,000 a year representing corporations.