It’s hard to disagree with the direction of this. But it’s worth being honest that the neuro-symbolic lineage lost to scale for most of the last decade.
At the surface, everything collapses into prose. Fluent text is a poor record of what produced it. Two systems doing completely different work underneath can return the same paragraph. Whether anything symbolic is happening has to be answered below the language layer and not in the prose.
LLMs are excellent at prose, and they’ll remain relevant in that era. But prose is not the thing to lean on once a task needs real adaptation, verification, planning, or abstraction.
The lineage has been kept alive in places with DeepMind’s theorem-proving work among them and it’s finally starting to look right again.
@apewoodx Thinking about this some more. That whole period of from 2010-2014 was incredible: MBDTF, Cruel Summer, Watch the Throne, GKMC, Take Care, etc.
Hip hop becoming more and more culturally relevant in fashion. NYC club scenes: up and down, 1 oak. Good times
Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?
hold on, this is a bad deal
- vc fund taking no carry (they don't expect upside?)
- you are actually paying 1% + opex for the top layer fund, /on top/ of paying 2% + ~20% carry to the actual underlying vc fund who invests
- the -1.11% is a "subsidy", so actual cost is ~5%
@kondortrades @princebtc28@AgentChud > there's no way to tell it apart from a regular LLM call
you'll appreciate what the team is working to release next