boomerf3tt

Lurker lurking less...

[boomerf3tt @boomerf3tt]

@WClemente How dare you ignore my $10 weekly buy side flow…

[boomerf3tt @boomerf3tt]

@badhombre I scoop up these disillusioned people for follows on X, strong based signal

[boomerf3tt @boomerf3tt]

@elonmusk I think the German word for news is 'election interference' or something...

[boomerf3tt @boomerf3tt]

@SantiagoAuFund Steady lads… deploying more Fartcoin…

[boomerf3tt @boomerf3tt]

One year anniversary of my fav bitcoin commercial…

[Michael Saylor @saylor]

You know what's interesting these days? #Bitcoin https://t.co/XTFwl0CCIK

[boomerf3tt @boomerf3tt]

@Pledditor @coinbase I don't trust any wrapped BTC personally, was more making a comment on their decision itself to explain why I don't think they need 'technical' or 'legal' reasons to delist necessarily.

Cheers

[boomerf3tt @boomerf3tt]

@adamtaggart @jessefelder They sell against the passive flows because there's always a buyer, @profplum99 has convinced me tangentially that this isn't the indicator you think it is.

[boomerf3tt @boomerf3tt]

3 bps = 0.03% per day
5 bps = 0.05% per day
Assuming 250 trading days per year:

Low end: 0.03% × 250 = 7.5% per year
High end: 0.05% × 250 = 12.5% per year

For 7.5% annual return:
$1,000,000 × (1 + 0.075)^10 = $2,061,032

For 12.5% annual return:
$1,000,000 × (1 + 0.125)^10 = $3,247,604

Nice

[boomerf3tt @boomerf3tt]

@fraz_6 @ashtonforbes @briankeating @neiltyson @piersmorgan It would be a waste of time.... @ashtonforbes 's time

[boomerf3tt @boomerf3tt]

@inrecra @profplum99
@SantiagoAuFund

They'll never drink the koolaid, and I love them for that...

[boomerf3tt @boomerf3tt]

@GoingParabolic @GoingParabolic 🖖

[boomerf3tt @boomerf3tt]

@Timcast Someone's been watching Landman

[boomerf3tt @boomerf3tt]

@DAVID19Vincent @PhdBrandenburg I'd love to be a fly on the digital wall...

Force projection or disclosure? I guess we'll find out but I'm a pessimistic man.... cheers gents.

@ashtonforbes

[boomerf3tt @boomerf3tt]

@jvisserlabs Updated weightings from @SEANSTACKN
https://t.co/YPGcjDRDrn

[SEANSNACKN @SEANSTACKN]

@boomerf3tt @jvisserlabs INDEX:BTCUSD/(BATS:AAPL*0.1345+BATS:MSFT*0.1265+BATS:GOOGL*0.1347+BATS:AMZN*0.1382+BATS:NVDA*0.1517+BATS:META*0.1336+BATS:TSLA*0.1816)

these are the most recent weightings I found

[boomerf3tt @boomerf3tt]

For the TradingView bros... my attempt at btc/mag7 index:

Simple Average Version:
COINBASE:BTCUSD / ((NASDAQ:AAPL + NASDAQ:AMZN + NASDAQ:MSFT + NASDAQ:GOOGL + NASDAQ:NVDA + NASDAQ:TSLA + NASDAQ:META) / 7)

Weighted Composite Version (use whatever weights you think make sense): COINBASE:BTCUSD / ( (NASDAQ:AAPL*0.27) + (NASDAQ:MSFT*0.22) + (NASDAQ:GOOGL*0.15) + (NASDAQ:AMZN*0.12) + (NASDAQ:NVDA*0.09) + (NASDAQ:META*0.08) + (NASDAQ:TSLA*0.07) )

[boomerf3tt @boomerf3tt]

@golden_ratioed @jvisserlabs The weighted should be calculating %market cap no?

I won't claim the %s are perfect and it's annoying to have to calculate and update the indicator, but any more specific and I'd have to make a pine script I think.

Maybe I'll spend time this weekend...

[boomerf3tt @boomerf3tt]

@M0rgUK @jvisserlabs https://t.co/vJHsGKi3ye

[boomerf3tt @boomerf3tt]

'my attempt'... but you are right and I'm too lazy (and uneducated) on a Friday afternoon:

Index Construction Method for the MAG7

Bloomberg’s MAG7 Reference:
Could be a proprietary or user-defined index in the Bloomberg terminal that may use a specific weighting scheme, currency adjustments, or a different set of representative tickers.

Your TradingView Composite:
If you’re using a simple or even a market-cap-weighted average you manually defined, it’s likely less complex or uses different weights. Bloomberg may incorporate free-float adjustments, sector biases, or corporate actions differently.

Corporate Actions and Adjustments

Bloomberg’s index might factor in stock splits, dividends, and other corporate actions to create a continuous, adjusted time series. This ensures historical comparability but can alter the chart’s shape.

Your TradingView formula is likely just a raw division of today’s prices, without any historical normalization adjustments.

Index Base Values and Starting Points

Bloomberg’s chart could have a rebasing date (for example, starting the index at 100 or another base value at a certain historical point) or may reflect a long-term adjusted index value.

Your TradingView ratio is a direct calculation of today’s prices over historical data, meaning its absolute values and the shape of the chart can differ if Bloomberg’s index is normalized or rebased differently.

[boomerf3tt @boomerf3tt]

@markhaven_ @jvisserlabs https://t.co/vJHsGKi3ye

[boomerf3tt @boomerf3tt]

'my attempt'... but you are right and I'm too lazy (and uneducated) on a Friday afternoon:

Index Construction Method for the MAG7

Bloomberg’s MAG7 Reference:
Could be a proprietary or user-defined index in the Bloomberg terminal that may use a specific weighting scheme, currency adjustments, or a different set of representative tickers.

Your TradingView Composite:
If you’re using a simple or even a market-cap-weighted average you manually defined, it’s likely less complex or uses different weights. Bloomberg may incorporate free-float adjustments, sector biases, or corporate actions differently.

Corporate Actions and Adjustments

Bloomberg’s index might factor in stock splits, dividends, and other corporate actions to create a continuous, adjusted time series. This ensures historical comparability but can alter the chart’s shape.

Your TradingView formula is likely just a raw division of today’s prices, without any historical normalization adjustments.

Index Base Values and Starting Points

Bloomberg’s chart could have a rebasing date (for example, starting the index at 100 or another base value at a certain historical point) or may reflect a long-term adjusted index value.

Your TradingView ratio is a direct calculation of today’s prices over historical data, meaning its absolute values and the shape of the chart can differ if Bloomberg’s index is normalized or rebased differently.

[boomerf3tt @boomerf3tt]

'my attempt'... but you are right and I'm too lazy (and uneducated) on a Friday afternoon:

Index Construction Method for the MAG7

Bloomberg’s MAG7 Reference:
Could be a proprietary or user-defined index in the Bloomberg terminal that may use a specific weighting scheme, currency adjustments, or a different set of representative tickers.

Your TradingView Composite:
If you’re using a simple or even a market-cap-weighted average you manually defined, it’s likely less complex or uses different weights. Bloomberg may incorporate free-float adjustments, sector biases, or corporate actions differently.

Corporate Actions and Adjustments

Bloomberg’s index might factor in stock splits, dividends, and other corporate actions to create a continuous, adjusted time series. This ensures historical comparability but can alter the chart’s shape.

Your TradingView formula is likely just a raw division of today’s prices, without any historical normalization adjustments.

Index Base Values and Starting Points

Bloomberg’s chart could have a rebasing date (for example, starting the index at 100 or another base value at a certain historical point) or may reflect a long-term adjusted index value.

Your TradingView ratio is a direct calculation of today’s prices over historical data, meaning its absolute values and the shape of the chart can differ if Bloomberg’s index is normalized or rebased differently.

[boomerf3tt @boomerf3tt]

@SantiagoAuFund Doing a disservice to those of us who want to hear all sides of the argument... but I understand. Hope you reconsider...

Cheers