@DanIsett Fanning the flames is never advisable. This story isnโt over yet. Appeals, counterclaims, congressional intervention, inter- and inter-league deliberations. A lot in flux that could bite you in 24 hr
Itโs the offseason. See the class action out of Cali today?
@BuckeyeScoop We are in a timeline where tOSU and UM are arguing who is more like Texas Tech? What reality is this?
FYI, we didnโt expect this to be the outcome and now Techโs a tough spot. But watching it unfold is probably like the Sherrone Moore saga - a whole lotta WTF
I think it's insane that a state judge can temporarily tell the NCAA they aren't allowed to enforce a rule that every student-athlete agreed to follow. I say temporarily because this is just an injunction, and I'd wager the NCAA would (will?) ultimately prevail at trial.
I also don't think betting pennies on your own team from the literal stands warrants losing out on a season 4 years later, when there's a 100% chance that the integrity of games was never compromised. It's a really harsh penalty.
It is difficult to rationalize those two thoughts. But it is possible to believe them at the same time.
Regardless, the notion that Tech Football should seppuku itself by not playing Sorsby is hilarious. After all, a conference opponent that knowingly played Sorsby lobbed this grenade into Tech's lap. And we're only a few years removed from conference realignment meaning Tech Football could be in the Mountain West or WAC. They tried (and are still trying) to kill us.
There is no honor to restore in college football.