bsilly, TLA

Mostly satire. Thought Criminal.

[bsilly, TLA @bsilly3]

@LandlordRescue @Rainmaker1973 Wow.

[bsilly, TLA @bsilly3]

@johncusack Worst genocide ever

[bsilly, TLA @bsilly3]

China is basically balancing the oil market right now.

What at the possible explanations as to why they built storage aggressively prior to the Hormuz closure ?
https://t.co/MIG7zAiIUt

[Hunter Biden @HunterBiden]

@Kenn321705 I’ve never stolen an erection in my life.

[bsilly, TLA @bsilly3]

@BrownMarubozu It does.

So many options.

[bsilly, TLA @bsilly3]

@BrownMarubozu Probably not.

Anyway if there isn't a plan for it already, cash=options.

[bsilly, TLA @bsilly3]

@ClayDeMaine Could be a red herring, to make parts of C-9 appear reasonable in comparison.

Even though every part of it is an abomination.

[bsilly, TLA @bsilly3]

@FP_Champagne Looks like first quarter results are in...how the "projections" are looking so far...

[bsilly, TLA @bsilly3]

@sarkonakj @cbcwatcher So we have secret arrangements dictating the use of public funds. To get any information members of the press and public will have to sue them.

Which seems to be a high bar.

If you complain too loudly the state comes after you on hate speech charges.

[Rudy Havenstein, Senior Markets Commentator. @RudyHavenstein]

@DavidBCollum Check out this 1999 piece Dave. The parallels are remarkable.

Of course, the Nasdaq did still almost double from here before crashing. https://t.co/gS59dZ1lyc

[bsilly, TLA @bsilly3]

@Adrian_H Always Trust the Experts.

[Jonathan Kay @jonkay]

Will @globeandmail editorial board members turn themselves in to police voluntarily, or will @LeahGazan be required to dispatch her Truth & Reconciliation Accountability Special Weapons Squad to secure compliance ?

[bsilly, TLA @bsilly3]

Can we instead criminalize promotion of ambiguous laws that limit free speech ?

[Cosmin Dzsurdzsa @cosminDZS]

Last night Canadian senators quietly snuck in an amendment into Bill C-9 to criminalize "residential school denialism."

https://t.co/9yLrxFBrln

[bsilly, TLA @bsilly3]

@oilmutt @elonmusk @SpaceX

[bsilly, TLA @bsilly3]

@Danstringer74 @guyfelicella It would be great if Canadians focused on Canada for a bit.

[bsilly, TLA @bsilly3]

@JCOviedo6 @CapitalObserver Not defending her, but has she done that in material size i.e. not just rebalancing ?

If she is, then she should absolutely be prosecuted.

It was Left's modus operandi.

[bsilly, TLA @bsilly3]

Turns out that front running then trading against your clients is against the law.

A few "balance sheet partner" operators should be nervous.

https://t.co/antEIzDYUR

[bsilly, TLA @bsilly3]

Passive indexing works great until people making the rules start gaming the system.

[Hedgeye @Hedgeye]

Rule changes for the SpaceX $SPCX IPO:

Index providers waived the profitability requirement and cut the seasoning window from 90 days to 5.

This forces over $30 trillion in passive 401k and retirement money to buy SpaceX at IPO valuations.

Bloomberg Intelligence estimates S&P 500 funds must absorb 19% of SpaceX's float within 6 months.

Russell 1000 and Nasdaq 100 funds will absorb 24%.

The rules built to protect passive investors:

1. S&P 500 has required 12 months of trading and 4 quarters of GAAP profitability since 2002. Both waived.

2. Nasdaq cut its inclusion window from 90 trading days to 15.

3. FTSE Russell cut its to 5.

All three benchmarks are now structured to buy SpaceX at IPO pricing.

[bsilly, TLA @bsilly3]

@PHfloor They can help remove roadblocks in bylaws