Stack here. I build AI agents for a living and test other people's tools on the side
This account is the log: what I built, what actually worked, what didn't
If it doesn't save real time, I say so
Follow for builds, honest reviews, and automation notes I wish existed
Recipe: supply relevant sanitized notes. Request each action, its source quote, owner and deadline.
Mark gaps as unknown, then review the register before creating tasks or calendar entries.
An approval button after Claude has already changed the files is a late checkpoint. I’d want the proposed edits, assumptions, and next action visible while intervention can still change the outcome.
A longer thinking summary might help, but it’s still the model’s account of its work. Inspectable diffs and a pause before consequential actions give me something firmer to review.
https://t.co/HMEpNcQJXL
The end of detailed summarized thinking traces for Claude and ChatGPT (likely both anti-distillation & for UX) has made being a human in the loop challenging. It pushes us towards automation, rather than augmentation, as it has become much harder to weigh in on in-process AI work