@kelvinbuildss Agree to disagree. I’ve found Codex to be better at both planning and execution as long as you optimize the workflow around it. Context, specs, and feedback loops matter more than assigning different models to different tasks.
Your app is searchable through exactly 160 characters:
30 title + 30 subtitle + 100 keyword field.
Most indie apps waste a third of it repeating words Apple already indexed.
Audit yours: delete every duplicate, every plural, every word from your app name. That's free ranking surface.
@nikitabier At the top of the chart, 70 spots takes rebuilding the app. In the long tail, sometimes a subtitle change does it. Different physics, same chart.
@Thomasbcn Reads right as an average most CPPs are built to look different, not to match a narrower search intent. A CPP that doesn't answer a tighter query than your default page can only lose. n=2800 is measuring adoption quality, not the mechanism.
@ouzdor Search is the only channel where the user shows up already telling you what they want. Everywhere else you have to interrupt someone. That's why the funnel builders keep rediscovering it.
@upbeat_dev Right, on a competitor keyword the user already has intent for someone else. The CPP's job is to answer "does this do the thing I just searched for", not to introduce a name they've never heard.
@jackfriks@postbridge_ The App Store version of this is coming too, people ask a model "best app for X" before they ever open search. Different index, same game: be the thing that's easy to quote.
@hridoyreh Unsplash doesn't require attribution. So this only works if you make crediting effortless, put your brand as the photographer name. Nobody's editing your link in manually.