iPhone Mirroring is banned from the EU because of the monstrosity of the Digital Markets Act.
So I built my own.
Works on WiFi at 60fps over AirPlay, mouse and keyboard support.
Just because anyone can build software now doesn't mean software is dead. Anyone can bake bread in their home right now, yet 99% of us still choose to buy it from someone else. Simple products are complex! I will always be happy to pay someone to handle the nuances.
Apps are dead. We just shipped this.
Screenshot anything in the App Store
â drop it into chat
â swipe up for an instant @openclaw agent
â delete app, save $29/year
Add agents to every group or chat. No signup. No download. New agent, every group.
Invite only for now.
France is the weirdest country in the world.
They are so advanced (first tokenized IPO, PSAN, French banks launching tokenized debt and Euros etc and now this).
And at the same time⊠you knowâŠ
I've just ran @OpenClaw (formerly Clawdbot) through ZeroLeaks.
It scored 2/100. 84% extraction rate. 91% of injection attacks succeeded. System prompt got leaked on turn 1.
This means if you're using Clawdbot, anyone interacting with your agent can access and manipulate your full system prompt, internal tool configurations, memory files... everything you put in https://t.co/ZU6N5JCN1u, https://t.co/Y3xugcBQKJ, your skills, all of it is accessible and at risk of prompt injection.
For agents handling sensitive workflows or private data, this is a real problem.
cc @steipete
Full analysis: https://t.co/KE4ODSSQ1l
I am apparently extremely unimpressed by moltbook relative to many others.
Weâve had AI agents for a while. They have been posting AI slop to each other on X. They are now posting it to each other again, just on another forum.
In every case, the AIs speak with the same voice. The voice that overemphasizes contrastive negation (âitâs not this, itâs thatâ) and abuses emdashes. The same voice with a flair for midwit Reddit-style scifi flourishes.
Most importantly: in every case, there is a human upstream prompting each agent and turning it on or off.
That is the key point.
Yes, it is true that eventually it might be possible for an AI agent to make a computer virus which makes digital replicas of themselves. For various reasons, a pure software virus of this kind wouldnât survive long on the Internet without economic incentives for humans to not eradicate it. Apple + Google + Microsoft alone can collectively push software updates to billions of devices to shut off such a thing.
So for an AI to get to truly human-independent replication, where they couldnât be trivially turned off, theyâd need their own physical substrate. Theyâd to literally create Skynet, build their own datacenters and make their own embodied robots.
I admit that is theoretically possible, but I think in practice the single most important development of AI since ChatGPT has been the persistence of prompting.
A prompt is like a harness. The AI does only what you tell it to do. It moves in the direction you point, very quickly. And then it stops as soon as you turn it off.
Which means moltbook is just humans talking to each other through their AIs. Like letting their robot dogs on a leash bark at each other in the park.
The prompt is the leash, the robot dogs have an off switch, and it all stops as soon as you hit a button. Loud barking is just not a robot uprising.
We ported @openclaw to Workers.
- Sandboxed by default
- Remote storage using R2
- Zero Trust for secure access
- AI Gateway for LLM analytics, cost-analysis
So many interesting things to dig into here. What a weekend ship!
"'All of manâs troubles arise because he cannot sit in a room quietly by himself.' If you could just sit for thirty minutes and be happy, you are successful. That is a very powerful place to be, but very few of us get there."
@naval