Every sentence you write should serve that one purpose. Every sentence should pass the “is this arguing that what I propose has to be done and has to be done today?” If the answer is no, delete that sentence.
An inspiration to so many.
For his impact off the field, @CamHeyward is your 2023 Walter Payton Man of the Year!
📝: https://t.co/Q6NRfhjdqA | @Nationwide
Here's the story of how some senior academics plagiarized my work, led by my former advisor Stuart Pimm.
I reported research misconduct to @DukeU a while ago.
Earlier this year, they had to acknowledge their wrongdoing, though they did so very subtly.
This is what happened👇
@iGrrrl@azfaust I think my mistake was not including a RSP with a 2 sentence explanation that no new resources are being developed that could be shared.
Has anyone received comments on #NIH summary statements from reviewers and SROs regarding the lack of the Resource Sharing Plan and/or Data Management and Sharing Plan for post Jan 25th subs?
@iGrrrl@azfaust I do not understand why summary statements are asking for an RSP when one is not needed (i.e. testing a patent-protected small molecule in a mouse model of cancer at a CRO).
@iGrrrl@azfaust I understand and agree that IF a proposed scope of work requires animals, antibodies, etc. that cannot be purchased commercially THEN a RSP is required.
Only if you are developing a "model organism" or "research tool"- otherwise everything that was addressed in the RSP is now baked in to the DMSP
https://t.co/zaLfpi8Qr5
RSP is no longer required as a stand alone document, but its content is now baked into the DMSP, however the DMSP is no longer visible to reviewers... so neither should be included in what reviewers get to critique- right?
This is a great opportunity for ESIs who want to transition to a start up/ small business. (Note- only for a few institutes). RFA-CA-23-035: Small Business Transition Grant For Early Career Scientists (R42 Clinical Trial Not Allowed) https://t.co/qEthycv2iu