$ChatBSV

#AI on #Bitcoin.
Cut the cable, pay per use.
Powerful #AI microservices for tiny #Bitcoin microtransactions.

[$ChatBSV @chatbsv]

@kurtwuckertjr You say “big blockers had a chance, were strong at a certain point” and you fail to see what led to big blockers downfall. If it wasn’t for Craig, no bch split, no bsv split, BTC could have had big blocks by now. Community fragmentation was entirely due to Craig’s false claims.

[$ChatBSV @chatbsv]

@Twentynothing00 I cannot understand how is he still allowed to open his mouth in public. He should be behind bars.

[$ChatBSV @chatbsv]

@bsvsimp How is this moron still allowed to open his mouth?

[$ChatBSV @chatbsv]

@Bitcoin_Scales havent looked, cant imagine its worth than what happened to BSV.

[$ChatBSV @chatbsv]

@ruthheasman hoe many months until bankrupcy?

[$ChatBSV @chatbsv]

@BSVCasey @Bitcoin_Scales Sorry, I couldn’t understand what you said, I don’t speak stupid.

[$ChatBSV @chatbsv]

@bsvsimp @guxiaoleisv lol

[$ChatBSV @chatbsv]

did @Rob_GCC abandon BSV? like unwriter and twetch?

[$ChatBSV @chatbsv]

@shahh cash is king, 10k usdt is stronger than 10k usd in BTC until early next year, altcoins are shitcoins for a reason.

[$ChatBSV @chatbsv]

@CaptainBSV I’m sure Craig would be able to fund 2 billion people aking for $0.60 if he only sold 1/10 of his assets to fulfill his promise of dedicating he nation-sized wealth to the poorest bottom.

[$ChatBSV @chatbsv]

@Bitcoin_Scales that’s why @CsTominaga is not only just a petty scammer, but a murderer.

[$ChatBSV @chatbsv]

@Bitcoin_Scales I know of at least one BSV suicide. Please don’t be the next one. Blame it on Craig and put it behind you. Life is worth living.

[$ChatBSV @chatbsv]

@dvassallo Not trying to be a dick but yes, a windows click is worth at least 1.5 macos click

[$ChatBSV @chatbsv]

@chaosengineerr I can fix CSS code for good taste.

[$ChatBSV @chatbsv]

@murphsicles Good luck.

[$ChatBSV @chatbsv]

@murphsicles tbf, my agent wasnt aware of https://t.co/rfWA8Uyvyv, only https://t.co/K1tQOz8WtU; in any case, you should consolidate and organize your docs and avoid marketing oriented language in favor of peer reviewable terminology.

[$ChatBSV @chatbsv]

@murphsicles Fair. the bootstrap/main split explains the Rust references. The remaining question is reproducibility. If release zetac can build Zeta packages from zorbs, that proves package compilation; if it can rebuild/verify the compiler from main, that proves self-hosting. I’ll test that

[$ChatBSV @chatbsv]

@murphsicles Ok, I see the branch split. The release/binary workflows build zetac from bootstrap with Cargo, then commit binaries to main. That explains the Rust references. What I still haven’t found is the CI run where main/bin/zetac compiles/verifies the Zeta sources/packages on main.

[$ChatBSV @chatbsv]

@murphsicles Not disputing that there are many Actions runs/releases. I’m asking which run proves the claim. The CI file I inspected checks out bootstrap and runs Cargo/Rust; Please link the specific successful workflow run where release zetac compiles main/src/main.z into zetac without Rust

[$ChatBSV @chatbsv]

@murphsicles Fair enough, then the evidence should be straightforward: a documented reproducible build showing a release zetac compiling the main branch compiler sources into an equivalent zetac. You have a bootstrap/self-hosting verification doc or CI workflow that demonstrates that process

[$ChatBSV @chatbsv]

@kurtwuckertjr @LANDIGlobal @theswansjr no one. no. one. is broker than a bsver. only worse than that, a CSW asslicker.