@NadigAjay Thanks :) I discussed the idea a bit in https://t.co/RM38mZeZ3b
However, such a test would require some additional statistical groundwork. I would love it if someone picked this up :)
After 4y in the making, I am super excited that my main PhD project is published 🎉🥳🎉🎉🥳
https://t.co/LCL2Dj1SOK
LEMUR is a tool to analyze multi-condition single-cell data and model differential expression as a continuous function of the cell-state space.
Some highlights⬇️
New single-cell analysis framework, LEMUR, disentangles covariates and latent cell states from multi-condition data to predict counterfactual gene expression and identify cell neighborhoods with similar DEGs without clustering. https://t.co/Dktxxek5C7 @NatureGenet @wolfgangkhuber
For the Monday morning crowds :)
Also, take a look at my blog post, in which I compress the full lemur package into 100 lines of code and explain the core algorithm.
https://t.co/c6ajj3DMn7
After 4y in the making, I am super excited that my main PhD project is published 🎉🥳🎉🎉🥳
https://t.co/LCL2Dj1SOK
LEMUR is a tool to analyze multi-condition single-cell data and model differential expression as a continuous function of the cell-state space.
Some highlights⬇️
Big shout out to everyone involved: my supervisor @wolfgangkhuber and everyone else who helped along the journey: @OliverStegle@s_anders_m@zauggj@LSaund11 https://t.co/EQCtrE1n9Q
And lastly, this link should work even without a Nature subscription: https://t.co/2cyIXnFJQv
Finally, we demonstrate LEMURs usefulness on
- a treatment vs. ctrl dataset from glioblastoma,
- Zebrafish developmental time course, and
- a spatially resolved Alzheimer dataset
where we find intriguing DE patterns
Extremely proud to see my PhD project exploring intra-tumor heterogeneity in complex karyotype AML finally out in @NatureGenet ! 🎉👩🏻🔬
They say that 10,000 hours make you an expert, so I guess after more than five years of work I’m half-way there 😅 ⬇️1/5
https://t.co/xe0WrtSRse
@kasparmartens Very nice work. I like your mean-perturbation-effect baseline, and the LLM embeddings from the sequence and text are a cool idea. I will update the Discussion to incorporate this :)
There's a lot of excitement about foundation models and their ability to learn biology 🧬💻
But current tools for perturbation prediction perform worse than simple linear models! We need more careful benchmarking to make progress.
https://t.co/lTJM7ghk2r
🚀Interested in doing a PostDoc in my lab?
Consider applying for a🇨🇭SNSF Swiss Postdoctoral Fellowship 2024. If you have any questions, join the information event tomorrow via Zoom (register via https://t.co/QsTKkraRIr) or reach out to us via https://t.co/KXW2tpttqy!
🧬Who should apply? Check that you fulfill the requirements. And: We are in particular interested in candidates with background in computational biology or machine learning applied to the biomedical domain!
https://t.co/QCtOIaybOj
Nice benchmark of single cell "foundation models" (scGPT, scFoundation) and GEARS (a GNN model) further hyped as "virtual cell models" against linear baselines on perturbation prediction.
Long-story short: they can't beat the linear baselines. 1/
@pan_cancer@Alejandro__TL replied on Github and clarified that Prophet in its current form is not intended for predicting perturb-seq experiments, but that they are considering adding that feature in the future.
@pan_cancer Yes, it would be great to include Prophet in the benchmark. I just asked how to best apply the software to genetic perturbation data (https://t.co/ShvI0woELK) because I don't quite understand yet how to use the software :)