#Frontierism is the malignant ideology made cognitive schema that believes what someone imagines to be possible is automatically possible because they imagined it.
Such imaginative entailment is the epistemological engine of Frontierism.
This is actually a smart idea. Proof of stewardship. Prove you can contain mega-capable A.I or you are not allowed to build it.
Simple: safety protocols and strong sandboxing come first, or you won’t be able to run those program.
REGULATE for safety not to shape creativity.
Jensen Huang, the CEO of leading AI company Nvidia, just said:
If an AI model will "damage the world — then I think the answer is that we have to shut the labs down."
My new bill to ban Artificial Superintelligence would do just that.
If you can't control it, don't build it.
JUST IN: Xi Jinping invites 100,000 young Americans to study in China over the next 5 years to experience “the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.”
You don’t need to be a vegan personally to recognize that this system of industrial extraction is not wise, just, or healthful. It is cruel and ugly and destructive. We need a revolutionary scale transformation and we need it very urgently.
This is the way forward. Hegemons cooperating on matters of planetary significance: climate policy, clean tech, ecosystems conservation/restoration.
Any thing these behemoths can work on in shared interest will allow them to forge relationships that act as a barrier to war.
What is abundantly clear is that advanced drone warfare needs to be the priority for the Canadian military.
Create such advanced drone swarms that American fascism would risk everything they hold dear if they ever started marching north.
That’s exactly that what the techno-zealots are seeking. Move fast, break everything “human” — on the way to some posthumanism enmeshment fantasy.
We need to metabolize that.
Techbro accelerationists was to exit the human space asap. That is their politics, explicitly.
New essay. I am worried that we might entrust more and more of our thinking to machines, and gradually cease to sustain the habits and institutions through which we had once cultivated our minds.
https://t.co/m6seOiPZ0m
I am worried that we might entrust more and more of our thinking to machines, and gradually cease to sustain the habits and institutions through which we had once cultivated our minds.
Such a surrender might happen amid considerable prosperity and be celebrated, at every stage, as progress. Each concession would come with an excellent justification: an economy of effort, a saving of time or an answer superior to anything we could produce ourselves. Only slowly would it become apparent that, in relieving ourselves of the burden of understanding, we had also diminished our capacity to govern our affairs. And by then, a preference for machine rule might seem entirely sensible. It would materialise not through violent and forced takeover, but by our own volition, with our own diminished abilities the strongest argument for such an arrangement.
The constant refrain that A.I is just “software” is underplaying the capability of these programs by a significant measure.
These programs have structure that enables multilevel decision activation and task completion. Combines in swarms you get emergent capacity. That matters!!
I was invited to address the @UN Security Council this afternoon to discuss the unprecedented threat posed by uncontrolled frontier AI agents.
Humanity has summoned the courage and wisdom to manage catastrophic risks before. This is one of those moments, far bigger than any personal, commercial, or national interest. The choices we make about this technology today will shape generations to come. We must act now.
New newsletter: WHY WE'RE WRONG ABOUT CHINA AND AI
America's frontier AI policy seems to hinge on China. But when you talk to people at or near the frontier, it's astonishing how little we seem to know about how China thinks about AI.
So, I talked to several experts—@jordanschneider, @kyleichan, @mattsheehan88, @RushDoshi, @ChorzempaMartin, @pstAsiatech and more—and pooled their most interesting comments under 7 big questions, inc:
- What don't the frontier labs understand about China?
- What would actually scare the CCP into taking AI safety as seriously as, say, Anthropic?
- Does China think our AI safety concerns are legitimate, or a conspiracy to keep them down?
- What should we actually do now?
https://t.co/twTk1HPiyT
What is it called when the hardware, devices, supply-chain components, package managers, protocols, and infrastructure we all depend on are becoming nakedly adversarial?
Scientists have a history of trying — and failing — to link biology and quantum mechanics. The real connection between them may be in the math. https://t.co/0yJONsEKPn
🚨 PHYSICS IS BROKEN! MATTER IS AN ILLUSION, THE ATOM IS JUST TRAPPED LIGHT! A NEW ERA HAS BEGUN! 🚨
For 100 years, physics has treated "mass" as a fundamental, solid particle floating in an endless, empty void (ℝ⁴). What if that is a complete mathematical hallucination? What if mass is just light that got stuck in the geometry of space?
A year ago, we thought exactly like the academic establishment. Breaking a lifelong paradigm and reinterpreting everything from scratch is incredibly difficult. But mathematics is a stubborn thing. We realized one absolute truth: the infinite ℝ⁴ space is fundamentally defective in physics. It exists purely as an abstract mathematical concept, and we must finally understand that pure mathematics ≠ physical reality. We genuinely need your help to break this dogma!
DO NOT TAKE OUR WORD FOR IT. DO NOT BLINDLY TRUST AUTHORITY.
We wrote the code, we solved the math, and we are giving it to you for absolutely free. Read the preprint and verify it yourself.
Look at the real quantum photographs attached. On one side is the groundbreaking 2013 photograph of a Hydrogen atom's electron orbital, captured by researchers at the FOM Institute AMOLF in the Netherlands using a quantum microscope. On the other side is the famous 2015 photograph from EPFL in Switzerland, capturing light behaving simultaneously as a wave and a particle.
Notice the absolute revelation: they are visually identical. Atoms are not solid little billiard balls. They are concentric interference patterns-pure standing waves of energy.
The ultimate conceptual shift of our IT³ framework is this: The atom is not a "box" that contains trapped light. The atom IS the trapped light.
There is no abstract container. There is only the geometry of the vacuum (a discrete lattice) which mathematically forbids light from propagating past certain algebraic boundaries.
How it Works (Explained simply from the video):
Let’s break down exactly what you are seeing in the simulation engine:
〰️ The Cyan Wave (→): A free gauge photon travels smoothly through the quantum vacuum.
🛑 The Kummer Wall (Red Lines): Suddenly, the light hits the absolute edge of the spatial lattice. This is an algebraic cutoff where mathematics literally runs out of resolution (√13 ∉ 𝕂). Space "does not exist" beyond this boundary.
🪞 Total Internal Reflection (Purple Wave ←): With nowhere left to go, the photon undergoes complete topological reflection. It bounces back as its own precise mirror image-an antiphoton.
⚡ The Birth of Mass (Yellow Core): The two opposing waves crash into each other and geometrically interlock. They form a perpetual, vibrating "standing wave" whose energy is trapped in one place. This localized density of confined energy is exactly what we call REST MASS.
The Counterfactual Test:
Watch the timeline in the visualizer. When the system hits the "WALLS OFF" phase, we computationally delete the vacuum boundaries. The golden pulsating core immediately shatters. The light escapes into infinity, and the mass drops precisely to zero. Matter literally un-braids back into pure radiation.
FALSIFIABILITY AND PREDICTIONS:
The "Mass Gap" is not solved by adding endless, arbitrary parameters to an infinite void. It is solved by recognizing that the Universe is a discrete, constructible topological crystal. Our model is strictly falsifiable and delivers exact predictions:
🎯 It predicts a new topological resonance at exactly 1088.04 GeV, accessible for verification at the High-Luminosity LHC.
🛑 It mathematically proves the absolute end of the periodic table at element Z = 172.
🧮 It operates with ZERO fitted parameters. All physics is reduced to the strict arithmetic of integers.
THE HARDWARE CODE OF THE VACUUM MATRIX:
🌌 Arena: ℳ = 𝕊⁴ × 𝕋³ over the field 𝕂 = ℚ(√2, √3, √5)
👁️ Witness: 172 topological elements
⚙️ Processor: 57600 = 240² = 1110 0001 0000 0000₂
📖 DOWNLOAD THE CODE. BREAK THE MATH.
We do not want blind faith. Read the proofs. The supreme judge is the compiler, not closed-door committees.
🔗 Code + Preprint:
https://t.co/9Mi0PlL0BS
https://t.co/jOAcppCe0j
#Physics #QuantumMechanics #Simulation #OpenScience #MassGap #TheoryOfEverything
“AI’s low reliability and accuracy rates in critical environments with life-or-death consequences” are of much greater concern ... than are threats of the technology wiping out humanity, which she calls “fear-mongering”. @HeidyKhlaaf - thanks for that!
https://t.co/PSVqFeCkDi
"AI is a civilizational technology."
Fei-Fei Li, CEO of World Labs and Stanford professor, says AI must develop within an ecosystem of open source, closed source, academia, government and civil society.
Technology this powerful cannot be shaped by one institution alone.