@GoogleDE why are you censoring my review?
This place in #pirna is not safe. People should know.
@LRAinPirna@GruenePirna maybe you can figure out what's going on on this campsite, which is under admistration of the Stadtwerke (municipal utilities) of Pirna.
Thank you @ypjang for your very colorful presentation at the International Congress on Natural Products Research #ICNPR in #Krakow. Also loved the informative #AI generated imagery!
#ICNPR24
@PrasadShastri@Ella_Maru Problem is, the point of science is not being captivating.
The image is supposed to illustrate the mechanism of a medical treatment but does not convey anything. Whole paper is BS anyways.
@ValerioCapraro I would agree that the text is very likely AI-generated. But we also have to consider that ChatGPT will also change language itself, especially among non-native speakers. Words like "intricate", "delve", will become more common because people get used to reading ChatGPT output.
I found another AI-generated garbage diagram in a scientific journal.
It’s entirely gibberish and features anatomically incorrect limbs with too many bones.
https://t.co/hDKZ0RA87b
@fake_journals@RetractionWatch Not surprised.
@MDPIOpenAccess general policy is to tolerate plagiarism. It doesn't matter what they say in press releases.
There was no action on this case reported April 16:
https://t.co/I4MbsXq6G9
@MDPIOpenAccess@antibioticsmdpi
This paper is full of plagiarism and mistakes.
I emailed the editor and editorial office on April 13, no response. This is outrageous.
Please retract it immediately.
#ResearchIntegrity
https://t.co/6zcSa42bT4
@FarleyKatz1 @MicrobiomDigest I guess we only see the bad fakes and the majority remains unspotted. Some people manipulate smarter than others.
Also, if they were talented why wouldn't they do science instead?
@larsjuhljensen@MicrobiomDigest@NatureNeuro@Stanford Do universities in the US get premiums for research fraud?
'Cause I still can't see how this will pay off long-term. They're undermining their reputation and credibility.
@_SachinGaur@BWJones No, those are really mistakes. In a personal communication Roche told me they're working on taking the site down because of too many mistakes which they can't fix quickly.
I've documented many under #RocheFix but there are even more.