Chris Nathan

I was the shadow of the waxwing slain.

[Chris Nathan @cwnathan]

"People who think differently and are willing to speak up if they disagree with you make you smarter, almost as if they are extensions of your own brain. People who try to silence or intimidate their critics make themselves stupider..." - Jonathan Haidt https://t.co/UnQxEvoABu

[Chris Nathan @cwnathan]

@DrRnldChevalier @ericweinstein You're missing his point. Under attack, he's defending his credibility. That's not "bragging."

[Chris Nathan @cwnathan]

@BrookeDallas @ericweinstein Very helpful. Thank you.
By the way, for those of us who hadn't heard it used before: "lubricious" means "(1) marked by wantonness : LECHEROUS (2) having a smooth or slippery quality" Great word!
https://t.co/9Vs9O4uCd2

[Chris Nathan @cwnathan]

@AbdulGoata8rx @europa But it wasn't Muslims. Are you stupid?

[Chris Nathan @cwnathan]

@benjamin_horne @DavidSacks You have no absolutely idea how Washington works.
My guess? You're one of those "straight" guys who gets a little buzz, a little frisson, a little tingle using the word "gay," yes? There's porn for that if you're really curious. No one has to know.

[David Sacks @DavidSacks]

Many have reached out to me regarding the new Cyber EO. A few thoughts:

First, President Trump is the most pro-innovation president we’ve ever had. He’s made it clear that the U.S. has to win the AI race and that a pro-innovation, pro-energy, and pro-infrastructure policy is the way to do that. Thanks to President Trump, AI will generate over a 2% tailwind to GDP growth this year, with hundreds of thousands of new construction jobs and 25-30% wage increases for blue collar workers. President Trump is the reason that we have an AI boom happening right now.

The change in the EO from a 90 day to 30 day period is a game changer because it allows our AI labs to comply with the voluntary framework without delaying new model releases. They can synchronize their efforts under the EO with other pre-release activities. Furthermore, I’ve been advised by the lawyers who draft EOs that 30 days means calendar days, not business days. In the AI race, every day counts.

As OSTP well notes, “The EO creates a process for frontier labs to voluntarily share cutting-edge cyber models in order to secure critical infrastructure and strengthen the government’s own cyber defenses. We are NOT conducting oversight of all new models, as that level of government overreach would have chilling effects on free speech and innovation.”

OSTP’s characterization is completely consistent with the discussions that I have participated in, where it was agreed that the EO is intended to apply only to models that represent a meaningful step-change in cyber capabilities (eg Mythos), not to incremental version numbers of existing models (eg Opus 4.7 -> 4.8).

Finally, I understand the concerns of many that this could morph into an “FDA for AI”. Of course bureaucratic mission creep is always a danger and this should be closely monitored. But the EO expressly forbids the creation of a new licensing, preclearance, or permitting regime. Most importantly, I do not believe that President Trump would allow this to happen.

As AI presents new policy challenges (such as cyberweapons), I believe that everyone in the administration is working diligently to navigate the issues with the American people in mind. I look forward to working with the Treasury, NSA, ONCD and others on the implementation of this framework.

[Chris Nathan @cwnathan]

@LouisShulman @MarioNawfal @elonmusk You’re not good at sarcasm. You may want to try some other type
of humor.

[Chris Nathan @cwnathan]

@Gia_Santos_ @RepSwalwell You think admitting to “mistakes” after lying through his teeth for a week is accountability? It’s not. “Mistakes” - please. If your abusers admitted to “making mistakes” would you praise them for their “accountability”? I sure hope not.

[Chris Nathan @cwnathan]

@riyazmd774 @riyazmd is using AI here to waste your time. It’s a Q&A video meandering through topical concerns mildly interesting in 1992 and of no relevance today. Jobs never uses the words “meaning” or “experience” even once. Unfollow people who abuse your attention like that.

[Chris Nathan @cwnathan]

@theKukata @riyazmd774 100% right. The guy posting this is wasting your time. It’s a Q&A meandering through topical concerns mildly interesting in 1992 and of no relevance today. Jobs never uses the words “meaning” or “experience” even once. Unfollow people who abuse your attention like that.

[Chris Nathan @cwnathan]

@asifaslam0 @NYPDPC The evidence talked. It said: “I am a bomb”

[Chris Nathan @cwnathan]

@VoteDEM2026 @Sassafrass_84 Resentment. What a nihilistic basis for thinking about the world.

[Chris Nathan @cwnathan]

@VoteDEM2026 @Sassafrass_84 “Soldier”

[Chris Nathan @cwnathan]

Iranian Emergency - We're Watching a Thousand Hindenburg Disasters in Re... https://t.co/2H5EsUpQus via @YouTube

[Chris Nathan @cwnathan]

https://t.co/IpcWpYeIGv

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

This is the only way to stop civilizational suicide.

It is critical that we take these steps to avoid annihilation.

[Chris Nathan @cwnathan]

Check out Philadelphia Eagles News and Gossip http://localhost:3000/info/5f4bdeef-0029-425a-9fc4-66fc457539e9

[Chris Nathan @cwnathan]

@RoaringBare @MosabHasanYOSEF @MitzpeRimon You Islamists are like insecure adolescent boys. You start wars to prove you’re real men. You sacrifice your own women and children to redeem some screwed up sense of injured Muslim pride. The Israelis fight to protect their women and children. Who’s more honorable? Insane tweet.

[Chris Nathan @cwnathan]

@AssalRad Because it comes from Al Jazeera?

[Chris Nathan @cwnathan]

@mike_ayar @kennycargill @megynkelly This is so great! You demonstrate the exact point I was making about trolls. Instead of answering the question ("Do you prefer war to a ceasefire or a ceasefire to war?") you throw up a new topic (Trump's campaign rhetoric). Lol. Maybe you should try another social media venue?

[Chris Nathan @cwnathan]

@kennycargill @mike_ayar @megynkelly @mike_ayar is a troll, posting to offend, never to inspire thought. The rhetorical pattern of all trolls is consistent. You see it here repeatedly: never answer a direct question directly. To do so would require interest in the the truth, not just clicks. Don't feed the beast!