@Q89013841@corgdad@leemarh7099 Not in book 4, but in book 6 there is an explanation of port keys on the school grounds and the whole reason the death eaters use the vanishing cabinet to infiltrate hogwarts
@toshirart@wondermagenta This 100%. Even if you don’t agree with him and his points, his videos are structured in a way that makes them interesting to follow and don’t waste your time arriving at the conclusion.
@kroganballeater @Avixxionn I think besides being more linear and the crest/tools system being less interesting than charms, Silksong gameplay is better in pretty much every way and after replaying HK you can immediately feel how improved SS is over it
@rahmelsjackson@GreenTextRepost Sure but his philosophy is pretty fkd. Advocates for people to just kill each other starting from birth because human instinct is to fight and wage war
@zpectral@JoshStrifeHayes Honestly I think red is likely to cause a bigger shakeup if blue were to lose. Blue winning means the world remains the same. In a red scenario it’s likely at least 5% of the world dies.
@wachig_wiwossa @micsolana So you believe everyone who read “everyone in the world” and interpreted that as the entire population of earth has a low iq? Seems you may just be a narrow minded and dismissive person.
@goofygray @MrDustyBowl@lporiginalg I simply reject living in a world where potentially up to almost half the planet dies. If that costs me my life so be it. If living in that world isn’t undesirable to you then I don’t begrudge your decision to pick red.
@T__Waters@HugeriskCapital@Rob_ThaBuilder Reframing it as a gun pointed to your head is to support your own argument when the reality is that it’s just a button. You’re less inclined to eat gross looking food even it tastes good. A button and a gun are incomparable. Why choose a world where up to 49% of the world dies?
@goofygray @MrDustyBowl@lporiginalg I think it’s dumber to expect all babies and blind people and children to press the red button than 50.01 of all people to press blue
@goofygray @MrDustyBowl@lporiginalg I’d rather die than live in a world where billions die. If others dying is of no concern to you then there’s nothing wrong with pushing red. It’s a difference of ideology. It’s impossible for 100% of Earth to press red and possible for up to 49% to press blue and die.
@drache_meister@MrDustyBowl@lporiginalg Think about it like this, by picking red you accept 1%-49.9% of the world dies. Even if you live, do you want to live in that world? Children, babies, blind people, etc. will die. If you are only concerned with your own self preservation and nobody else, then red is valid
If 100% of people push red then everyone lives
If 51% of people push blue then everyone lives
In the game every life on earth is a player. There’ll be blue pushers. By pushing red you’re accepting killing blue regardless of outcome. Question really is then: do you accept this?
Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?