Shokhrukh Kh.

seeker from post-Soviet uzbekistan. shaha#2565

[Shokhrukh Kh. @dansuber3]

@GordonRepinski @ChristinaStumpp Irgendwie ist es ziemlich unprofessionell von einem Journalisten, überhaupt darauf zu reagieren und seine eigene Meinung dazu abzugeben IMHO 🤷‍♂️

[Shokhrukh Kh. @dansuber3]

@malonebarry I suggest you to study this material. For a journalist you are posting too much slogans and use slogan language.

https://t.co/BxLG2b9dKH

[Shokhrukh Kh. @dansuber3]

@IngenannanACL @_FriedrichMerz @ZelenskyyUa Warmonger here is Putin. Don’t try to distort facts hiding behind “peace” symbols.

[Shokhrukh Kh. @dansuber3]

@Smariam1984 @JacquiHeinrich I saw disrespect only from Trump and Vance, who were just bullying Ukraine because they don’t have “cards”.

Really? Is that your diplomacy? If I’m stronger than you, I can do whatever I want and kill your people?

[Shokhrukh Kh. @dansuber3]

@elonmusk 🇩🇪 CDU 🇩🇪
AfD are Kremlin puppets. And now they are about to become Trump/Musk puppets.

[Shokhrukh Kh. @dansuber3]

@Inspired426 @piersmorgan @elonmusk Any proof? I also can make up a foolish story where I slander you.

I’m from Uzbekistan, post-Soviet (USSR) country, I know many Russian and I know many Ukrainians. And what you are trying to say and the way you try to picture the world is just untrue

[Shokhrukh Kh. @dansuber3]

@LennyPaine @ronzheimer Russian bot. If Russia attacks Germany you would still be praising Putin.

[Shokhrukh Kh. @dansuber3]

@AGDugin Старый долба*б

[Shokhrukh Kh. @dansuber3]

@elonmusk Wow, he genuinely went a bit crazy 🙄 I hope it was a silly joke, and he deletes this tweet

[Shokhrukh Kh. @dansuber3]

@FwoiblesWoW The Anniversary sercers were intended to serve as “Fresh” Era servers, staying true to the original Vanilla design, not as Seasonal servers with drastic changes. Correct me if I’m wrong, please.

Either drop those changes or announce another “Fresh” servers without these QoLs.

[Shokhrukh Kh. @dansuber3]

@ClaytonStone The Anniversary sercers were intended to serve as “Fresh” Era servers, staying true to the original Vanilla design, not as Seasonal servers with drastic changes. Correct me if I’m wrong, please.

Either drop those changes or announce another “Fresh” servers without these QoLs.

[Shokhrukh Kh. @dansuber3]

@wowclassicdevs @NoraValletta The Anniversary sercers were intended to serve as “Fresh” Era servers, staying true to the original Vanilla design, not as Seasonal servers with drastic changes. Correct me if I’m wrong, please.

Either drop those changes or announce another “Fresh” servers without these QoLs.

[Shokhrukh Kh. @dansuber3]

@wowclassicdevs The Anniversary sercers were intended to serve as “Fresh” Era servers, staying true to the original Vanilla design, not as Seasonal servers with drastic changes. Correct me if I’m wrong, please.

Either drop those changes or announce another “Fresh” servers without these QoLs.

[Shokhrukh Kh. @dansuber3]

@Zorbrix DualSpec basically implies that there are rigid roles that everyone should follow, which isn’t the case in Vanilla 2004 design.

It creates a dangerous precedent because such changes are irreversible in long term perspective. Changes are ok, but game defining changes aren’t 🙏

[Shokhrukh Kh. @dansuber3]

@Zorbrix Dear Zorbix, I’m shaha#2565 and I respectfully urge you to reconsider your decision regarding adding DualSpec. This addition fundamentally goes against Vanilla RPG defining game design elements and make talent tree devalued. It undermines they concept of importance of choice

[Shokhrukh Kh. @dansuber3]

@TheWindstalker dear Holly, I’m shaha#2565 and I’d like to inquire to reconsider the recent decision of adding DualSpec.

This is not merely a personal preference, it’s an objective issue that goes against the design principles of RPG elements and strongly diminishes their value.

[Shokhrukh Kh. @dansuber3]

@TheWindstalker @ClaytonStone => talents are there to allow players to tailor their character according to their subjective play style, not to establish “rigid spec” that everyone has to follow.

Adding DualSpec implies the latter, and destroys this Vanilla concept and extremely limits the purpose of talents

[Shokhrukh Kh. @dansuber3]

@TheWindstalker @ClaytonStone Dear Clayton, I respectfully urge you to reconsider decision regarding adding DualSpec as it directly goes against the very RPG elements of Vanilla and undermines the importance of choice philosophy.

There are not so much talents in Vanilla, and they are not spec defining... =>

[Shokhrukh Kh. @dansuber3]

@sarahleah1 @SenTomCotton @AIPAC You are part of the problem @sarahleah1 , by ignorantly labeling them as ‘war criminals.’ Whether deranged or not, by your own logic, you could also be labeled a fanatic.

He isn’t making threats, he’s objectively pointing out that such a law exists. He didn’t design it

[Shokhrukh Kh. @dansuber3]

@Warcraft @ClaytonStone I respectfully urge you to reconsider your recent decision to add Dual Spec. It goes against Vanilla design on many levels - game-mechanical and social.

It imply that there are only 1 proper way to play a class - which is completely not true in Vanilla.