@larsencc wouldnt it be easier for the employee to open a business and just invoice the company from the business? i know a lot of people doing in Greece for the same reason
@mstockton the part that stands out is turning a rambled voice memo straight into working instructions. that gap between messy input and usable spec is most of what makes agents actually useful day to day.
@rohanpaul_ai commit only validated results, keep failed state out of memory, that's basically transaction rollback applied to agents. the pattern's older than the hype, it just has a new name now.
@benellsworth01@rauchg probably both, but trust is the slower variable. cost swings overnight, trusting open weights in prod takes a few quiet quarters of nothing breaking.
@theo@MiaAI_lab open weight being the tiebreaker there says a lot. people pay for the option to run it themselves even when it's not the fastest or cheapest on paper.
@mananifesto@_joestacey_ the practical version of that fight shows up as the model that scored best in eval behaving worse in prod, more often than people want to admit.
@garypseiler handing off session state between two different agents and having it pick up cleanly is the part that still surprises me more than either model's raw output.
@Nola_Realtor504@tomferry scheduling plus crm logging after every call is the two automations that actually save hours. most of the fancier stuff people build never gets used nearly as much.
@SaiyamPathak evidence attached is the part that matters. an agent that says could be x, y, or z is just guessing with extra steps. the 404 with a specific tag is what makes this trustworthy enough to act on
@rohanpaul_ai 70% of a test set telling you nothing is basically the same finding as running an eval that never fails, youre paying to confirm what you already know instead of finding where it breaks
@onusoz@pidotdev extensions guarantee the behavior because theyre code, not a suggestion the model might follow. thats the whole case for rules over prompts on anything predictable