Dionysis

[Dionysis @dathin_]

@Apostologia I guess someone that represents anti Christian qualities of character while arguing for Christianity is ok for you as long as he is winning people over? But think about it, if greed is the gateway are they really entering the Tradition in anything but name?

[Dionysis @dathin_]

@Michaeldudufudu Debating technique over developing the qualities of the soul indeed. Ego inflation and self deception to the max.

[Dionysis @dathin_]

@ElonFinkelstein @Rainmaker1973 I honestly thought maybe the Ukrainian player had a backstory on why he really needed the money or something similar. To people saying this is about passion:
No, this is about misplaced passion and idolatry.

[Dionysis @dathin_]

@PageauJonathan We need a video on this 😁

[Dionysis @dathin_]

@SRFielding72 @piersmorgan This whole thing is like an optical illusion. You watch the whole discussion and what you see is your reflection. For all his flows Brand is describing Piers’ mind frame during the interview with crystal clear clarity.

[Dionysis @dathin_]

@karpathy Interesting but you have to be mindful that this store of **information** (not knowledge, it has never been more important to distinguish between information, belief and knowledge) is to a huge degree unverified, verbose and full of mistakes and even contains made up stuff.

[Dionysis @dathin_]

@birchlse Read the paper. This is not uploading in any way.

[Dionysis @dathin_]

@jhendersonYT We know what consciousness is because we are. We also know what digital computer architecture is down to the smallest scale and that it is observer relative and thus incapable of having understanding, as per John Searle.

[Dionysis @dathin_]

@LedermanHarvey Have you practiced the phenomenological method? As you are a philosopher it might be your only way out of what amounts to an intellectual pathology. I recommend Henri Bortoft’s two books and ‘History of the Concept of Time’ by Heidegger.

[Dionysis @dathin_]

@PageauJonathan @tjskene @JonathanPageau I think this point, the unity of the one and the many as One, is very difficult for many but crucial. But I see Christians consider creation as “separate” from God which I find really problematic. It’s not His fullness but not separate either as that would break the One, right?

[Dionysis @dathin_]

@dhh Nice! Worked on my Omarchy laptop for the first time during a holiday (on a Thinkpad I got for £260!) and it was a wonderful experience. Still doing my main work on my Mac Studio but I am already missing the custom window management setup..

[Dionysis @dathin_]

@AndyWilson55072 @elonmusk Doesn’t work though. I remember discussing this with the LessWrong crowd. It is more of an illusion of rationality because no one really tracks the numbers and the assignment is intuitive anyway. Its only real value is giving an intuition against black and white thinking.

[Dionysis @dathin_]

@vjbento @ThePrimeagen What other solution would you offer? Projects are getting flooded by poorly realised AI PRs. Being open only works if there is some kind of natural barrier and that barrier is gone so.. 🤷‍♂️

[Dionysis @dathin_]

@Sam_kuyp The only “natural” thing about it is that it is consistent with physics. It is an unprovable attempt to retain materialist, scientific realist metaphysics and it is so crazy that you are better off letting go.

[Dionysis @dathin_]

@_georgebaran @davidasinclair @Nature That is not true. Check for instance this paper and commentary: https://t.co/0Ww4AuFhPs

There is no interaction that causes the change. The equipment is the same and the knowledge of the observer by deduction.

[Dionysis @dathin_]

@dhh @ErgoDoxEZ is what you need. You just have to find your way to it 😌

[Dionysis @dathin_]

@PaulVanderKlay Until we can verify the claims I have to say I trust Oliver Sacks way more than @sapinker and magazines.

[Dionysis @dathin_]

@drmichaellevin @DrTomFroese @KarlFristonNews @ThouArtThat @blaiseaguera @akarshkumar0101 I am listening to the podcast with @lexfridman and you are actually answering this. It is all in the algorithm. We can fully explain why that pattern emerged from lower components! But in cells the point is that the pattern emerges **despite** their alleged “programming”.

[Dionysis @dathin_]

@drmichaellevin @DrTomFroese @KarlFristonNews @ThouArtThat @blaiseaguera @akarshkumar0101 🙏 But how about the hypothesis that the patterns are stored in the human (computer architecture being observer-relative at all levels)? In the sorting-algorithm experiment everything appears present in the code itself with cells checking against the CellStatus enum (FROZEN etc)