@_RP_77 Ah, gotcha.
Yes - it felt unreasonable. I don't like seeing people I otherwise admire call people names when they are engaging in what I feel is good faith. Here is the exchange, in case. You didn't see it.
According to Nigel Farage, Reform has vetting problems because it’s impossible to predict what people will say in the future.
But it seems even past comments can slip through the net.
Meet Sarah Wood, Reform Council Leader in Kirklees.
https://t.co/bikvMec2FT
@DanNeidle@_RP_77 They do. You're right, but you are a public figure. If I call someone stupid it doesn't matter. if you do it, your work is diminished a little bit each time. Just my view
@DanNeidle@_RP_77 You do better when you avoid calling random Twitter users stupid, in my view, Dan. I'm actually like your work and would prefer to see it receive higher profile.
I feel this misses the ideological connection between our hard/far right and Trump. They have the same mindset - no rules apply, if you can't buy it you can take it by force and if I say something with enough conviction, it is true. That is why they are still lashed to Trump.
Hague is demonstrably correct. Going to say it again. The fact there are still people on the right lashing themselves to and venerating Trump is incomprehensible.
This is a journey for our times; from liberal democrat to the grifting hard right. @sundersays - I recall your wonderful breakdown of this chap back in the day. Look where he is now!
The presenter - who left LBC after speading conspiracy theories about Covid - is to join the hard right TV channel
✏️ Rats in a Sack 🐀
https://t.co/j5cNn3xfne
'Trump, do the right thing... give this guy the support he needs to defeat the modern-day Hitler.'
@piersmorgan gives his message to Trump as Ukraine's President @ZelenskyyUa thanks him and the UK for their continued support.
Watch more 👇
📺 https://t.co/ukYrKq0sB9
@VladVexler Vlad, let me answer my own question and save you the time. I see now that the Foreign Office said this morning that Russia's efforts were unsuccessful. To me, that's incomplete communication, considering what Burnham said earlier.
@FreeNationTalk@FraserNelson Yeah - problems only ever get solved in one step, and are immediately irradiated, never to be seen again. Thats what my toddler thinks anyway, so it must be true
@C601kraken@bbcnickrobinson I’m saying it’s a non-serious question. No. States have rights under international law, but they don’t have an inherent right to exist forever in a particular form. People have rights; states change, divide, merge and disappear.