Spring AI 1.0.8, 1.1.7, and 2.0.0-M7 are out now! 🚀
2.0.0-M7 highlights:
🔧 ToolCallAdvisor is now the default
✨ New ToolSpec fluent API
along with important improvements, stability enhancements, and bug fixes on 1.1.7 and 1.0.8: https://t.co/7NPfeTNeeF
@MuhsinYRAP@bcherny Mine jumped to 15% on a simple question prompt…no thinking needed. it seemed to level out because i worked on 3 projects for the next hour or 2 and it only went up 11% more.
We've signed an agreement with Google and Broadcom for multiple gigawatts of next-generation TPU capacity, coming online starting in 2027, to train and serve frontier Claude models.
Claude Code is desperate for me to hang it up for the night. This is new. Its said “call it a night” multiple times during my latest convo.
“Want me to create an issue for that approach and call it a night?”
Anthropic is burning customer goodwill over something they already know how to fix
They price every API call to the cent but won't tell subscription users what their plan actually buys
People can accept tighter limits
What they can't accept is being told they all started using Claude wrong on the same day
People are reporting 40% of their Pro limit gone in 2 prompts. Full weekly allowances drained in 19 minutes. Single-word messages eating 1-4% of sessions
That is not a context window problem. It's a transparency problem
Anthropic is precise where it benefits them and vague where it protects them
The API pricing page is exact: Opus 4.6 runs $5 per million input tokens and $25 per million output. Every call metered
The subscription page says "more usage" and "5x or 20x more usage than Pro"
More than what?
Anthropic has never published how many tokens each plan gets
You can see what percentage of your limit you've used, but you can't see what the limit actually is. And you have no way to verify that what you're getting today is the same as last month
When Codex users started hitting rate limits faster than expected, OpenAI reset everyone's limits while they investigated. They said they didn't fully understand why and chose the cautious path
Anthropic's response was to tell paying users to downgrade
- Switch from Opus to Sonnet
- Turn off extended thinking
- Cap your context at 200k instead of the 1M they advertise
- Start new sessions instead of resuming old ones
In short, 'this is a skill issue'
Every one of those is a feature people are paying to access
Paying users should not have to reverse-engineer what their plan buys
If Anthropic wants to rebuild trust, the fix is straightforward
- Publish actual token budgets per tier, the same way they already do for the API
- Show what each message costs against the budget
- Let people verify for themselves whether the deal changed
They already do this on the API side. The choice not to do it for subscriptions tells you everything
@GergelyOrosz or the US govt could've announced Claude was used for some wartime activity and hacker groups immediately went to work. Not saying that happened, but timing seems suspicious.
hot take: any software engineer who is not already at close to 100% ai coding output should be cut within the next 3 months
not only are they inefficient, but they’ve also shown a lack of curiosity and willingness to learn
Introducing Claude Code Security, now in limited research preview.
It scans codebases for vulnerabilities and suggests targeted software patches for human review, allowing teams to find and fix issues that traditional tools often miss.
Learn more: https://t.co/n4SZ9EIklG
Today, the MCP community is announcing MCP Apps, the first official MCP extension. @code is the first major AI code editor with full MCP Apps support.
With MCP Apps, tool calls can now return interactive UI components that render directly in the conversation. Learn more: https://t.co/CyrbuqP330