@nytimes Yeah -- the evidence is overwhelming. People mocking the Times clearly didn't read the article. About what I would expect from an average user here.
@followthemotive@donlayman Lmao exactly right. "Demonize" has done jackshit to change eating habits. Try to tell someone eating a burger or pizza slice that they're making a poor dietary choice. You'll look like a fool at the dinner table.
@sguyenet@CaseyMeansMD@calleymeans Wild that 'The China Study' gets hammered for B12 risks, but a book demonizing heart-healthy plant fats (based on mechanistic speculation) gets a 79%. The bias against WFPB vs "Metabolic" marketing is showing.
@NathanLeamerDC@gigibsohn@protctdemocracy@TechFreedom@FCC Damn, it's almost like facts don't mean anything to you.
"At least three times in less than two years, courts have found that the Murdochs and Fox have acted in bad faith, spread misinformation, and engaged in conduct that in my opinion encouraged an insurrection."
@BrendanCarrFCC@protctdemocracy@TechFreedom@FCC Ooooh, Twitter fight! The core allegation in that petition was that a licensee who was found by *two separate courts* to have lied to the public about the 2020 election *lacked the character* to hold a broadcast license. Why didn’t you revive that one along with the others?