Derek

Adventuring with ai

Local Lab - Studio M3U 512GB · 2×DGX Spark · MBP M5 Max 128GB

[Derek @derekdeardorff]

@volatilemarkts Incredible, congrats!!

[Derek @derekdeardorff]

@volatilemarkts Popcorn is ready, can't wait to see this

[Derek @derekdeardorff]

@ashxhart @volatilemarkts Amazing!

[Derek @derekdeardorff]

@ashxhart Let's gooo!!!! ����🔥

[Geiger Capital @Geiger_Capital]

Open source AI models are very good for the general public and prosperity. They are very bad for frontier labs trying to gatekeep super intelligence for a fee and IPO at multi-trillion dollar valuations.

[Derek @derekdeardorff]

@GlenWilsonIA Very well articulated, I was thinking along the same track.

[Derek @derekdeardorff]

@ashxhart https://t.co/sncht5csRR

[Kevin Bass @kevinnbass]

Moskowitz and Karnofsky founded Open Philanthropy, the largest funder of AI doom.

They are *also* investors in Anthropic.

OP has given $312M in grants for 476 publications, influencing Congressional reports.

OP's parent org funded Jacob Coxon, who did an AI doom media blitz.

Overall, OP has given more than $1B to promote AI doom -- larger by more by an order of magnitude than the second largest funder.

If successful in manipulating public and Congressional opinion, this agenda could lead to regulatory capture of the AI industry and a monopoly by Anthropic and other AI giants.

The idea is this.

This industry must be regulated, and only the top AI companies can get it right. Insurmountable barriers might be placed to prevent competitors from entering the space.

Moskowitz and Karnofsky would benefit handsomely, and so would Anthropic employees and other investors.

Moskowitz and Karnofsky invested in Anthropic, but they also invested in AI Doom.

AI Doom is an investment that could pay off big.

AI Doom is Big Business.

[Derek @derekdeardorff]

@ashxhart Big Labs, influencers, politicians all saying the same thing, at the same time, all aligned. Seems like a PSYOP.

[Derek @derekdeardorff]

@jun_song Question is: Who would benefit most from AI regulations on open source models?

[Kevin Bass @kevinnbass]

Fourteen moves in eight days

The psyop to create hysteria to manipulate Congress into regulating AI.

Almost everyone involved is affiliated with Coefficient, Open Philanthropy, Anthropic, and/or OpenAI -- all who serve to benefit financially from creating regulation.

[Derek @derekdeardorff]

@kevinnbass Yes, this is a classic PSYOP

[Derek @derekdeardorff]

@jun_song It's a PSYOP

[Derek @derekdeardorff]

@Tech2Wild Classic PSYOP

[Derek @derekdeardorff]

@MiaAI_lab We're in the middle of a PSYOP

[Derek @derekdeardorff]

@hnshah ⚡️

[Derek @derekdeardorff]

@ashxhart All my research says this is what it takes to move the KV.
This is a piece I'm considering.
https://t.co/uB1GJ8j9Cc

[Derek @derekdeardorff]

@WescheNex1q Think about this....OpenAI, xAI, Anthropic etc. want you on their harness for business reasons $$$.... so WHY would they want you to use their model outside their harness???
** The excuse "model has been trained inside the harness, so it works better there"

[Derek @derekdeardorff]

@volatilemarkts @u1tra_instinct Nice!!! Can’t wait to test this!

[Derek @derekdeardorff]

@HermesAgentTips I have both. Get the Spark. AI is built on Nvidia.