@bluewmist@PradeepBonde Most people call it luck after they see the outcome. What they don't see are the hundreds of conversations, experiments, failures, and random opportunities created by simply showing up. Exposure compounds.
@ralliesarena Asked Qwen to analyze the stock market.
It replied, "Based on my calculations, stonks go up."
In fairness, that's still a better quality-control process than some products sold on Alibaba. π
The market rewards platforms more than products.
Notice the pattern:
IBM = computing platform
Microsoft = software platform
Apple = hardware/software ecosystem platform
Nvidia = AI compute platform
The largest companies often own the infrastructure others build upon.
The winner is rarely obvious at the beginning
In: 1980, few predicted IBM would eventually lose dominance.
2000, many believed Microsoft would stay on top indefinitely.
2012, Apple looked expensive to many investors.
2025, many argue Nvidia is in a bubble.
Lesson....
Leadership changes much more slowly than people think. Many investors spend enormous effort predicting the next leader, yet:
IBM ruled ~8 years
Exxon/ExxonMobil ruled 18 of 24 years between 1988 and 2011
Apple ruled 12 of 13 years from 2012β2024
Nvidia from 2025-
Lesson....
The "most valuable company" usually reflects the dominant economic force of its era.
1980s: IBM dominated the mainframe and enterprise computing revolution.
Late 1980sβearly 2010s: Exxon / ExxonMobil reflected the importance of energy to the global economy.
π§΅
1990sβ2000s: Microsoft benefited from the PC revolution.
2010sβ2020s: Apple rode smartphones, ecosystems, and services.
2025: Nvidia became the primary beneficiary of the AI infrastructure boom.
Lesson....