devwrite

Towards a better web

[devwrite @devwrite_]

@AdamRackis @DelaneyGillilan Check it out, it's a pretty cool feature of browsers nowadays

https://t.co/c6yNHu50Ne

[devwrite @devwrite_]

@AdamRackis @DelaneyGillilan HTTP cache handles this pretty well

[devwrite @devwrite_]

@martinlesko7274 @g2sans @tannerlinsley Why not?

[devwrite @devwrite_]

@adamhjk @solomonstre Do you do mocking in your black box tests when you have 3rd party integrations?

I meant to reply on this post: https://t.co/Jwm9bBC8Wo

[Adam Jacob @adamhjk]

@solomonstre Zero mocks, all in on true black box testing - nothing but the deployed thing, and then measuring its output.

[devwrite @devwrite_]

@adamhjk @solomonstre How do you handle third-party integrations?

[devwrite @devwrite_]

@anshnanda @branmcconnell What makes them useless?

[devwrite @devwrite_]

@oskdoessoftware @IamAroke The 200 makes sense here, but should certainly have an error in the body

[devwrite @devwrite_]

@VoidenMD @IamAroke If the endpoint is working fine and someone just entered wrong credentials then this is the preferred response

[devwrite @devwrite_]

@airuyi Why should a fiscally irresponsible nation state survive in the first place?

[devwrite @devwrite_]

@anshnanda @0xkkai What problems do they cause for you?

[devwrite @devwrite_]

@raggi @rajsinghtech Well certainly it offers at least *some* security?

[devwrite @devwrite_]

@1ovthafew @sampullara If this is the case, then you just delete the unit test as the unit isn't being refactored, but it is instead being changed entirely

[devwrite @devwrite_]

@sampullara The problem with not having unit tests is that it's really slow trying to test every permutation of inputs that a particular unit is supposed to handle when you are testing it through the UI. If you find unit tests useless, then they are testing at the wrong level of abstraction

[devwrite @devwrite_]

@W96Emily Unemployment at lows and the stock market at highs makes a strong case for a good economy

[devwrite @devwrite_]

@mdervin @ButtsoupBill @KrisVal @the_transit_guy They'd probably pay about what they are paying now

[devwrite @devwrite_]

@crayon_w99 @ButtsoupBill @mdervin @KrisVal @the_transit_guy The entire point is they don’t need to make that trade off with dynamic pricing

[devwrite @devwrite_]

@crayon_w99 @mdervin @ButtsoupBill @KrisVal @the_transit_guy Generosity not needed. Only profit seeking maximum profit needed. You’ve admitted as much

[devwrite @devwrite_]

@crayon_w99 @ButtsoupBill @mdervin @KrisVal @the_transit_guy So they’d rather make less money? That contradicts what you’ve been saying

[devwrite @devwrite_]

@crayon_w99 @ButtsoupBill @mdervin @KrisVal @the_transit_guy I’ve already explained this. If you can charge someone more, then you can charge someone else less and move more units and make more money

[devwrite @devwrite_]

@crayon_w99 @mdervin @ButtsoupBill @KrisVal @the_transit_guy Are you claiming that you’ve never not bought something because it was too expensive? I’ve provided a very simple reason for why they’d lower prices and still make more money, but you don’t seem to want to understand