I am writing to the public as a mother who has been vocal in advocating for the freedom and well-being of my daughter under Deprivation of Liberty Safeguarding.
Against the Law, she has been condemned for life by the Court of Protection as having no Mental Capacity, and despite the fact that she demonstrates her capacity all the time. She has lost her voice, her home, her family, her pets, her Human and Legal Rights and her autonomy. Against the advice of two doctors, and against her and family's wishes, she is forced into degrading treatment and is stuck in an engineered condition to suit the agenda that she lacks capacity, and despite the fact that there is a treatment that is available to her that works for her perfectly. All our attempts to reinstall this treatment are ignored.
Now I have found myself to be in contempt to Court, because out of desperation, I published some videos to show the degree of distress that my daughter is subjected to, despite the fact that these videos do not identify my daughter in any way.
There is also a precedent set up in my favour that allows me to tell my story, but my legal team completely ignored it and set me up to fail, claiming without any foundations that I lack capacity to instruct them.
In my pursuit to ensure my daughter's right to the best available treatment and her right to a meaningful life, I find myself in need of public support.
If you or anyone you know is available and willing to offer support by attending the hearing, it would mean a great deal to me and my daughter.
Your presence can make a significant difference in shedding light on the challenges we are facing and advocating for the well-being of those subjected to Deprivation of Liberty Safeguarding.
Your support is invaluable, and I appreciate any assistance you can provide during this challenging time.
I have a Court hearing on Tuesday 18 of February 2025 at 9.30am. The hearing will take place at the Royal Court of Justice, but it will be a remote hearing. You are all welcome to attend. The Court's link you may put your request to, for attendees will be published tomorrow evening. Alternatively, you can keep an eye on https://t.co/iaqttzfALa. It will be listed there as well.
Thank you everyone. 💕
Study of 10 post mortems in early 2020 shows severe respiratory distress.
The study accepts that this was caused by the killer virus but what else causes respiratory distress?
I’ll tell you… respirators and certain combinations of drugs, namely benzodiazepines and opioids. 🤔
@S0UNDK1LLAH66 My mums story didn't make it the national press, we as a family didn't want it to. My mum passed in Jan 2023, due to a clot causing a pulmonary embolism as well at the same hospital. Confirmed neglect by the coronor, they failed completely to diagnose my mum until hours before
#QEQM is an abomination!
Two of mine born there. My son’s birth (and from 10pm night before events onwards) was a comedy of errors. INCLUDING an epidural falling out! Clowns..utter clowns.
#NHS
https://t.co/gBJFI748ji
25. Prof David Jones, Anscombe Bioethics Centre.
“[There are] clear indications in several jurisdictions of palliative and end-of-life care deteriorating in quality and provision following the introduction of AD/AS... Palliative care is not improving as quickly in jurisdictions with AD/AS as it is in jurisdictions without AD/AS.”
23. Prof Chris Parker, oncologist at the Royal Marsden.
“I have little doubt that some...would choose assisted suicide if it was legal, because they were told they had less than six months to live, but in truth...would have lived for years and enjoyed a good quality of life.”
22. Karon Monaghan KC, widely regarded as the number one barrister on equality and discrimination.
“What persuades me in particular that this Bill should not be passed is the increased risk that would arise for vulnerable women. It is already the case that women kill themselves because of DV and coercive control…
“What is particularly worrying in this respect, and frankly inexplicable, is Cl 29 of the Bill.”
17. Baroness O’Neill, former chair of the Nuffield Foundation and of the EHRC.
“In a world of idealized wholly autonomous patients, and of wholly selfless and compassionate families and professionals, legislation...might...not be risky. But we do not live in that world.”
16. Ramona Coelho, member of Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) Death Review Committee, Ontario.
“MAiD may exploit systemic neglect...and may better be described as structural coercion to die—essentially the opposite of autonomy.”