Fellow fish-lovers! You don't need this companion (no new orbits!), you can watch the lore online, and we can have a pull party on the rerun next year! There is only one chance to bring back Valko.
Don't pull, don't spend!
#全世界都爱敖尹#NoValkoNoMoney#BringBackValko
I came back shortly to say:
With the authority that gives me having mained Rafayel exclusively for two and a half years, I give you all permission to flood his myth posts with comments about Valko.
You’re welcome.
oh no, if only a fluffy wolf, nerdy hot chairman, muscular, touch loving, snuggly man called Valko were here to keep me warm through the night 🥺 #全世界都爱敖尹#BringValkoBack
Mad as hell mad as hell mad as hell. Can't believe I'm gonna have to boycott my main's myth. Can't believe I can't experience his event because I'm not logging in. Not 1, but 2!!!! Battle companions I'm not gonna have omfg. Mad as hell.
#BringBackValko#全世界都爱敖尹#LADSIs6
Oook here goes nothing lol the masses (2) have spoken!!
tbh I really wanted to share this even if it goes to the void but was really fun drawing extra buff Rafayel aaaa
#ValkoisLoved#BringBackValko#全世界都爱敖尹
Rafayel mains stand with Valko!
Not spending a dime until Valko is back.
Not pulling for anything until Valko is back.
Not logging in until Valko is back.
To lose Valko is to lose Love and Deepspace.
#全世界都爱敖尹#ValkoIsLoved#NoValkoNoMoney#BringValkoBack#Valkois6thLl #ValkoReturnToLADS #LadIs6 #InfoldSpeakUp #SpeakUpInfold
A rational piece of hopium: what if Infold already knows what it wants to do, but needs a safer way to do it?
I am writing this now for a reason.
We are entering a very strange and exhausting stage of this boycott.
New paid content is appearing again, but for many people it does not feel exciting. It feels insulting.
I keep seeing people look at banners for characters they genuinely love and think:
“So now you are using my main to recover the money you lost after cancelling Valko?”
“Is Caleb being turned into a financial test subject for a crisis he had nothing to do with?”
“Will Rafayel be next because stronger content has a better chance of forcing people to open their wallets again?”
I understand why people feel that way.
After weeks of silence, watching Infold continue monetisation without addressing Valko can easily look like the company is trying to sell its way out of the crisis rather than solve it.
But I want to offer another possible interpretation.
Not because I think Infold deserves blind trust. Not because I have insider information. And definitely not because I can promise that Valko is coming back. I cannot.
This is simply one hypothetical business scenario that I think is worth considering.
I may be completely wrong.
But if even part of it is correct, several things that currently look disconnected or irrational begin to fit together surprisingly well.
And if that is the case, the next few weeks may matter much more than they appear to.
First, one extremely important assumption
Everything I am about to write operates under one condition:
Valko, in the form Infold originally intended to release him, must still be legally and administratively releasable.
We do not actually know whether that is true.
There could theoretically be an undisclosed legal issue. A regulatory or content-approval problem. A contractual issue. A licensing issue. An internal compliance concern. A security-related process. A legal consultation. An administrative proceeding. Or some completely different obstacle that the public knows nothing about. There could even be an ongoing legal or security process in connection with events surrounding the controversy, in which case lawyers may have advised Infold not to comment publicly while it remains unresolved.
I have no evidence that such an obstacle exists. I am not suggesting that it does. I am acknowledging the possibility because any serious theory needs to recognise the limits of what we know.
So this entire scenario begins with:
Assuming there is no external legal or administrative barrier preventing Valko from being restored, what if Infold already wants a way to reverse the cancellation?